Skip to main content

Radio Direction Finding and Sense Antennas... Oh and the Equivalence Principle

For what's going on with research, scroll down.  But first, another study topic for the amateur radio extra class exam.  One of the questions asks what the purpose of a sense antenna is.  The correct answer is that "It modifies the the pattern of a DF antenna array to provide a null in one direction."  Whatever that means.  The DF referred to in the answer is direction finding.  Small loop antennas, like the one shown in the picture to the left (picture 1), can be used to find the direction that radio signals are transmitted from.  By rotating the loop until the received signal becomes the weakest, you can locate the direction.  There's only one problem, you can't tell whether the signal is coming from in front of, or behind the loop.  This is where the small vertical antenna in the picture comes in.  That's the 'sense antenna' or 'sense aerial'.  Its signal is added to the signal of the loop antenna and the net result is that it provides a uni-directional antenna pattern, (see the second picture).  I hope to be back soon with lots of cool information on exactly how it does it.


A little History
The first radio direction finder was invented by John Stone Stone an American electrical engineer and physicist.

Research Blog
I'm reading through several papers on the equivalence principal, which I used to think said that you can't tell the difference between a gravitational field and say a centrifugal force[2].  It looks like, at least at relativistic speeds, I may have been wrong.  There's been quite a bit written on this[4][5], and it's taking me a while, but I'll keep you up to date.


References
1.  Awesome listing of direction finding radios
http://www.angelfire.com/space/proto57/rdf.html

2.  Equivalence principle
http://copaseticflow.blogspot.com/2013/01/benchtop-tests-of-general-relativity.html

3.  Ham radio study exam
http://copaseticflows.appspot.com/hamtest

4.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119%2F1.3272719
Muñoz G. & Jones P. (2010). The equivalence principle, uniformly accelerated reference frames, and the uniform gravitational field, American Journal of Physics, 78 (4) 377. DOI:
open access version:  http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.3022

5.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2F0003-4916%2863%2990051-4
Rohrlich F. (1963). The principle of equivalence, Annals of Physics, 22 (2) 169-191. DOI:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Cowbell! Record Production using Google Forms and Charts

First, the what : This article shows how to embed a new Google Form into any web page. To demonstrate ths, a chart and form that allow blog readers to control the recording levels of each instrument in Blue Oyster Cult's "(Don't Fear) The Reaper" is used. HTML code from the Google version of the form included on this page is shown and the parts that need to be modified are highlighted. Next, the why : Google recently released an e-mail form feature that allows users of Google Documents to create an e-mail a form that automatically places each user's input into an associated spreadsheet. As it turns out, with a little bit of work, the forms that are created by Google Docs can be embedded into any web page. Now, The Goods: Click on the instrument you want turned up, click the submit button and then refresh the page. Through the magic of Google Forms as soon as you click on submit and refresh this web page, the data chart will update immediately. Turn up the:

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very sim