Skip to main content

Benchtop Tests of General Relativity

If you're like me, you might find astronomical tests of general relativity a bit well, impersonal, (no offense to the astronomers and cosmologists out there).  If that's the case, you'll be happy to know that there was a series of laboratory/benchtop tests of general relativity tests performed in the early 1960s.  While they receive far less publicity and class time than their solar eclipse/mercury perihelion counterparts, these experiments proved the gravitational Doppler shift of gamma ray frequencies using fairly compact and very self-contained laboratory apparatus.

The discovery that enabled these experiments was the Mössbauer effect.  Mössbauer found that very pure crystals could absorb and emit a highly specific frequency of gamma radiation.  If the frequency of the incident gamma rays was changed by a tiny amount, (say the amount that might be caused by general relativistic effects in the laboratory), then the crystal would simply absorb the gamma ray without re-emitting it.  This allowed other researchers to look for and detect effects that modified the frequency of gamma rays by minuscule amounts.

The experiment that gets the most attention was performed by Pound and Rebka in 1960.  To provide the change in gravitational potential, they actually separated their gamma source and their detector at opposite ends of a 74 foot high tower at Jefferson Laboratory.  Their apparatus is shown below and the experiment is summarized on the APS web site.

My favorite version of the experiment, however, is the one done by Hay, Schiffer, Cranshaw, and Egelstaff which scooped Pound and Rebka by two months.  Hay and associates took Einstein's principle of equivalence at face value, (a gravitational acceleration is indistinguishable from any other kind in the accelerating frame).  Rather than utilizing a tower to provide the gravitational potential difference, they built their apparatus on a rotating disc.  The source near the center of the disc experiences a different centripetal force than the detector at its edge.  Their much smaller apparatus is shown below.

Picture of the Day:

From 1/10/13


Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla

to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.

What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:

2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:

3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:

How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though!

Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very simpl…

Unschooling Math Jams: Squaring Numbers in their own Base

Some of the most fun I have working on math with seven year-old No. 1 is discovering new things about math myself.  Last week, we discovered that square of any number in its own base is 100!  Pretty cool!  As usual we figured it out by talking rather than by writing things down, and as usual it was sheer happenstance that we figured it out at all.  Here’s how it went.

I've really been looking forward to working through multiplication ala binary numbers with seven year-old No. 1.  She kind of beat me to the punch though: in the last few weeks she's been learning her multiplication tables in base 10 on her own.  This became apparent when five year-old No. 2 decided he wanted to do some 'schoolwork' a few days back.

"I can sing that song... about the letters? all by myself now!"  2 meant the alphabet song.  His attitude towards academics is the ultimate in not retaining unnecessary facts, not even the name of the song :)

After 2 had worked his way through the so…