Skip to main content

Benchtop Tests of General Relativity

If you're like me, you might find astronomical tests of general relativity a bit well, impersonal, (no offense to the astronomers and cosmologists out there).  If that's the case, you'll be happy to know that there was a series of laboratory/benchtop tests of general relativity tests performed in the early 1960s.  While they receive far less publicity and class time than their solar eclipse/mercury perihelion counterparts, these experiments proved the gravitational Doppler shift of gamma ray frequencies using fairly compact and very self-contained laboratory apparatus.

The discovery that enabled these experiments was the Mössbauer effect.  Mössbauer found that very pure crystals could absorb and emit a highly specific frequency of gamma radiation.  If the frequency of the incident gamma rays was changed by a tiny amount, (say the amount that might be caused by general relativistic effects in the laboratory), then the crystal would simply absorb the gamma ray without re-emitting it.  This allowed other researchers to look for and detect effects that modified the frequency of gamma rays by minuscule amounts.

The experiment that gets the most attention was performed by Pound and Rebka in 1960.  To provide the change in gravitational potential, they actually separated their gamma source and their detector at opposite ends of a 74 foot high tower at Jefferson Laboratory.  Their apparatus is shown below and the experiment is summarized on the APS web site.

My favorite version of the experiment, however, is the one done by Hay, Schiffer, Cranshaw, and Egelstaff which scooped Pound and Rebka by two months.  Hay and associates took Einstein's principle of equivalence at face value, (a gravitational acceleration is indistinguishable from any other kind in the accelerating frame).  Rather than utilizing a tower to provide the gravitational potential difference, they built their apparatus on a rotating disc.  The source near the center of the disc experiences a different centripetal force than the detector at its edge.  Their much smaller apparatus is shown below.

Picture of the Day:


From 1/10/13

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very sim

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain

More Cowbell! Record Production using Google Forms and Charts

First, the what : This article shows how to embed a new Google Form into any web page. To demonstrate ths, a chart and form that allow blog readers to control the recording levels of each instrument in Blue Oyster Cult's "(Don't Fear) The Reaper" is used. HTML code from the Google version of the form included on this page is shown and the parts that need to be modified are highlighted. Next, the why : Google recently released an e-mail form feature that allows users of Google Documents to create an e-mail a form that automatically places each user's input into an associated spreadsheet. As it turns out, with a little bit of work, the forms that are created by Google Docs can be embedded into any web page. Now, The Goods: Click on the instrument you want turned up, click the submit button and then refresh the page. Through the magic of Google Forms as soon as you click on submit and refresh this web page, the data chart will update immediately. Turn up the: