Skip to main content

NaI Scintillators in Liquid Helium

After yesterday's attenuation calculations, I'm trying to find out if I can place the scintillator directly into the liquid helium Dewar to avoid the attenuation of flux due to the Dewar walls and solenoid windings.  I came across an interesting article that was a portion of Fernand Bedard's PhD dissertation in 1956.  It's interesting for lots of reasons.  First, Bedard was working with Hans Meissner.  Second the article mentions currents across insulating junctions with superconductors on either side in 1956, several years before Josephson would do his Nobel prize winning work on Josephson junctions.  Finally, Dr. Bedard wound up working for the NSA!

Then, there's the pragmatic stuff.  It looks like they did place their NaI crystal in the Dewar.  The article also mentions that they were able to load 2 liters of liquid helium using only 5.5 liters.  They apparently lost only 3.5 liters to boil off!  The article also has an excellent description of their procedure and of issues they had with their photomultiplier tube.  A diagram of their Dewar is shown below, (picture 1).


References:
1.  Bedard on Dewar and photomultiplier usage and of course, electrons from superconductors
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRev.102.667
Bedard F., Meissner H. & Owen G. (1956). Investigation of Electron Emission from Superconductors, Physical Review, 102 (3) 667-670. DOI:

Other Handy References on NaI Detectors
Link to nice article in ROSI on NaI detectors

Increased counts down to 0 C

Temp vs. response time



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Please leave your comments on this topic:

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...
10 comments
Read more

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the  +Sage Mathematical Software System  today, (the files been  added to the public repository [3]).  If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica.  Oh, and it' free.  I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory.  What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly.  Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...
3 comments
Read more

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in...
1 comment
Read more