Skip to main content

The Default Debacle

As I continue my study of RubyOnRails using Build Your Own Ruby On Rails Web Applications by Patrick Lenz, I'm including expansions on certain topics that piqued my interest. First, here are a few useful links if you're reading the book too.









Today I diverged from the examples in the book again and encountered an issue with the word 'default'. It turns out that default is a SQL keyword depending on the context of the expression it is used in. I wanted to store a default value for a record in a table. This is illustrated in the table below:

user
default
actual
tom
sleep
sleep
bob
awake
sleep
susy
awake
awake

The table tracks the 'default' or usual state of each user and their current 'actual' state. This seemed simple enough. The add_column call in my migration file had no problem with the column name 'default'. However, when I tried to add items to the table, the column name 'default' caused an SQL error. This is because the word 'default' can have a special meaning in an insert query.

There may be a way to escape 'default' so that it's accepted as a column name, but I don't know what it is. (If you do, please comment! Thanks!) So, the simple path seemed to be to just rename the column. But... when I used rename_column, I also received SQL errors. The solution that finally worked was to first use remove_column to get rid of the column all together. Fortunately since insert didn't like 'default' there was no data in the column to worry about deleting. I then added the column default_value using the add_column call.

Just to be on the safe side, I did not implement the opposite of add_column in the self.down method of the migration file.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the  +Sage Mathematical Software System  today, (the files been  added to the public repository [3]).  If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica.  Oh, and it' free.  I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory.  What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly.  Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in...