Is the QRP Labs QMX the Core of a Future TouCans Lite Plus?

Reading qrper.com over the weekend—an excellent QRP specific blog with lots of guests posts—I found an article about the QRPLabs QMX. I'd not heard of the rig before, so I settled in for a good read. And, and SIGH!!!!

That was a happily exasperated sigh, as often happens when one reads something by a member of the Ham Radio Workbench Podcast crew. You know, the kind that means I'll probably be spending money soon, and probably also quite a bit of mostly fun building time :) Speaking of time sinks, I really enjoyed reading the FDIM paper QRPLabs linked to from the QMX page.

So! The rig's cool! It's a (tunable!) QRP five band rig!

"Well", I thought, "I'll read the assembly manual." "That will put me off," I thought...

Not So Much! Sadly, for my wallet and time budget. Please mark my famous kit-building last words, but that doesn't look that bad!

OK, ok, ok, I hear what you're saying, "But will it fit in the rig?"

Well, yeah.

The enclosure for the QMX is 3.623 x 2.481 x 0.99 inches, (where I've rounded up in every case.) Consequently it will fit handily in a pineapple can that measures about 3 7/16 inches by 4 inches. Frankly, the whole thing might fit in 'just' a tuna can, even in an enclosure. Which, just so you know, I have no intention of doing.

Here's the other really cool thing. The QMX also has CAT control. I've not worked with such a fancy thing before, but I'm guessing the Pico-W we're currently controllin TouCans with can handle cranking out serial commands for the CAT contoller! And can the rig operate headless? Maybe? I did find one reference to headless operation in the manual. Here's hoping it can run truly headless, because what good is a LCD display in a pineapple can 15 feet up in the air anyway?

It looks like the QMX might be my next attempted QRP Labs build. Hoooo boy :)

Update!

W6CSN, one of the other POTA activators here in San Francisco built his own QMX! Reading through the article makes the whole thing sound daunting, yet achievable. This is sounding better and better!

Comments

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the +Sage Mathematical Software System today, (the files been added to the public repository [3]). If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica. Oh, and it' free. I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory. What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly. Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1. While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero. This is typically explained in the following way. While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare. That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2]. Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector. Its operation is in...

Copasetic Flow

Search This Blog