Skip to main content

Tuna Topper and Rockmite Packaging

The 12 year-old and I got a chance this last weekend to test out the Rockmite complete with Tuna Topper amplifier on a POTA activation. The results were outstanding! We were making a QSO per minute for most of the activation. Something we've never done before.

On top of  that, the prototyped packaging of the combo of devices solved a few problems we've always had when we suspended the Rockmite from the antenna. Here's a look at the how the pair were packaged together:



The first, biggest advantage, is that we moved the BNC coax connector out of the equation. As you can see, it is now the input to the Tuna Topper. That means that it is not supporting the antenna. That means that there are no longer any torques on the BNC connector in the case. This fixes an issue that inspired so many washi tape fixes.

The second advantage is that there is now access to the power leads outside of the Rockmite. This frees us up to send power in on a different path than the Ethernet cable inspired by the original Flying Rockmite and the OpenHeadsetInterconnectStandard from N6MTS. This means that we can bring big chunky power wires, perhaps twisted around the Ethernet cable, up to the Tuna Topped Flying Rocmite, reducing voltage drop. I'm looking into using 8 D cells as opposed to 8 AA batteries.

The last advantage relates to the first: The RF output lines are no longer attached to a coaxial BNC connector under radial stress either. The two banana posts seen at the top of the radio case attach to the antenna wires, and are attached to nothing inside the radio case. We're not going to have any more broken RF output  feed wires!

Next steps are going to be to look at putting the Rockmite and the Tuna Topper into the same can to make everything a bit cleaner and easier to use.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Cowbell! Record Production using Google Forms and Charts

First, the what : This article shows how to embed a new Google Form into any web page. To demonstrate ths, a chart and form that allow blog readers to control the recording levels of each instrument in Blue Oyster Cult's "(Don't Fear) The Reaper" is used. HTML code from the Google version of the form included on this page is shown and the parts that need to be modified are highlighted. Next, the why : Google recently released an e-mail form feature that allows users of Google Documents to create an e-mail a form that automatically places each user's input into an associated spreadsheet. As it turns out, with a little bit of work, the forms that are created by Google Docs can be embedded into any web page. Now, The Goods: Click on the instrument you want turned up, click the submit button and then refresh the page. Through the magic of Google Forms as soon as you click on submit and refresh this web page, the data chart will update immediately. Turn up the:

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very sim