Skip to main content

Things I Learned: Google App Engine Django Platform Search Index Updates

Let's say you have a deployed Google App Engine application you've been using for years like the ham radio practice exams we're updating here. You decide to output data the app is obviously using all the time. For us, it was the table of help topic links for each exam question. You think you're going to output the data easily, and then:

NeedIndexError: no matching index found. recommended index is

and nothing.

This happened here today, (obviously right?) I had to walk through a series of documentation steps and log messages, but the answer in the end was simple.

First, the message above doesn't turn up in your app, it turn up in your log message explorer. For us, that's at 

https://console.cloud.google.com/logs/query;cursorTimestamp=2023-07-03T15:57:44.595552Z?project=hamdaise


Next, that's where you'll find an actually very handy error message with this at the bottom (your data model will be different unless you forked the ham radio exam repo.)





That's the hint that tells you to look in your app's index.yaml file. But don't just look there, actually add the suggestion to the file. Then redeploy so the file is sent to your app on Google App Engine. Then, you're not done.

For your last step, run this command using gcloud:

gcloud datastore indexes create index.yaml

Then, just to be sure you did everything correclty, check for your new index at:
https://console.cloud.google.com/datastore/databases/-default-/indexes?project=hamdaise
(adapted for your app of course)

You'll see something like



It will take a minute or two (literally) for the green checkmark to appear next to your new index. After that, things should work again.



References:



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the  +Sage Mathematical Software System  today, (the files been  added to the public repository [3]).  If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica.  Oh, and it' free.  I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory.  What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly.  Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in...