Rockmite Log: 2023_02_05 Flying Rockmite parallels the slope of the hill

The Rockmite ham radio flies above San Francisco, and maybe has new RBN spotting results? After having quite nice results at Organ Mounains when running the antenna along a ridge as opposed to across it, the 12 year old and I repositioned the home station antenna to run down our hill instead of across it. We don't have a whole lot of data yet, but things look promising.

First, here's a video of the antenna arrangement at Organ Mountains. Note that the Rockmite connector is embedded in the antenna 'flying rockmite' style:

We took down the inverted Vee at the house, replacing it in a similar fashion with an antenna that roughly matches the slope of our hill with the radio again flying in the middle:

So far, results look promising, but we don't have enough data to make a clear call yet:

Things to note:

The spot in Canada was before we brought the radio in for rain proofing. The house-side antenna mount is now about six inches lower that it was when we were spotted in Canada.
This is the first time the KD0FNR Rockmite has been spotted by W7MRF which iterestingly is a school station setup by NXP.
Changing the antenna position may have changed increased our received signal strength. On the other hand, it could just be that we're operating later in the day. We'll collect more data to find out.

It looks like W7MRF is not a new spotting station as they have results at througout the day today, but they have no spotting results on January 31st (randomly chosen data download to check for the station). We may have been spotted there for the first time today because this is one of the first times they were listening.

Update!!!

And then this happened!

This is very different compared to the rest of the day prior to this update. The difference, at least the visible one is that a large rain storm in the East Bay is lifting away to the East.

Comments

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the +Sage Mathematical Software System today, (the files been added to the public repository [3]). If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica. Oh, and it' free. I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory. What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly. Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...

How Many Files Can You Add to a GPT Project? An Interview with GPT-5 on Limits, Context Engineering Tips, and Chats

Setting the scene: I’m tinkering with Project TouCans, knee-deep in radio logs, SQLite dumps, and Cesium code. Naturally, I’m wondering if shoving all this into one GPT Project is a recipe for brilliance… or for disaster. So I turn to Vril — you know, after Brainy from the Legion of Super-Heroes , because what else do you call your AI sidekick who always has the answers? Time to ask him straight up. [ As an aside, yes, GPT-5 has decided to sometimes call me Vail. I'm not sure why to be honest. Also, I asked Vril, er GPT-5, to write up our interview for me. Apparently, me asking it to 'Bro' up a few stories, just for fun, has convinced Vril that I use 'Like,' more than I actually might. ] Me (Vail): So Vril, how many files can I throw into a GPT Project before it just starts choking? Like, is there some magic number where the context window taps out and everything falls apart? GPT-5 (Vril): Great question. There’s no single hard file limit. What matters is ...

Copasetic Flow

Search This Blog