Took apart the apparatus at the bottom of the proposed Dewar
stick. This is stick that will eventually support all the required apparatus in liquid helium. Pictures follow. Per normal, if this is your first day on the site, scroll to the bottom for the experimental background.
The inside of the Dewar measure out at 1 and 1/8
inches. That works out to about 1.25
cm. Then, plugging that into an
expression for the size of cylinder we can get to fit
Working with square cylinders
|
||||
Inscribe a square inside a circle
|
||||
circle radius
|
0.5625
|
1.42875
|
cm
|
|
square side
|
0.795495129
|
1.010279
|
cm
|
|
Square radius
|
1.010278814
|
The above distances are to the wall of the Dewar. If we back off of this a little bit and give
ourselves an 1/8 of an inch clearance at
all the corners, we get
Working with square cylinders
|
||||
Inscribe a square inside a circle
|
||||
circle radius
|
0.5
|
1.27
|
cm
|
|
square side
|
0.707106781
|
0.898026
|
cm
|
|
Square radius
|
0.898025612
|
a radius of 0.89 cm.
That gives a maximum energy of about 290 keV and a total flux of 10,000
events per quench. How does this jive
with the sensitivity of the NaI detector?
This fits well within the range of the signals the detector is sensitive
to:
Source
|
Peak Channel
|
Energy eV
|
Cd109
|
|
|
am241
|
110
|
26344
|
Cs 137
|
121
|
32000
|
Am241
|
221
|
59541
|
Cd109
|
|
|
Cs 137
|
2118
|
662000
|
For reference, here’s what the Cs137 spectrum looked like in
the fiberglass Dewar
As it turns out, the brass disc at the bottom of the stick is too wide to fit in the Dewar. It will b removed soon.
To Do:
·
Characterize the detector response with the
glass Dewar
·
Calculate the solid angle with the detector much
closer to the source
·
Characterize the background response in the
basement
Updates for the experimental plan:
Attempt to do a 90 degree rotation of the sample between
runs. This should help to account for
any directionality issues due to the sample being a cylinder and not a sphere.
A possible source for the sample
Back to spheres?
The extruded version of this might work fine
Background
Hirsch's theory of hole superconductivity proposes a new
BCS-compatible model of Cooper pair formation when superconducting materials
phase transition from their normal to their superconducting state[1]. One
of the experimentally verifiable predictions of his theory is that when a
superconductor rapidly transitions, (quenches), back to its normal state, it
will emit x-rays, (colloquially referred to here as H-rays because it's
Hirsch's theory).
A superconductor can be rapidly transitioned back to its normal state by placing it in a strong magnetic field. My experiment will look for H-rays emitted by both a Pb and a YBCO superconductor when it is quenched by a strong magnetic field.
A superconductor can be rapidly transitioned back to its normal state by placing it in a strong magnetic field. My experiment will look for H-rays emitted by both a Pb and a YBCO superconductor when it is quenched by a strong magnetic field.
This series of articles chronicles both the experimental lab
work and the theory work that’s going into completing the experiment.
The lab book entries in this series detail the preparation and execution of this experiment… mostly. I also have a few theory projects involving special relativity and quantum field theory. Occasionally, they appear in these pages.
The lab book entries in this series detail the preparation and execution of this experiment… mostly. I also have a few theory projects involving special relativity and quantum field theory. Occasionally, they appear in these pages.
Call for Input
If you have any ideas, questions, or comments, they're very
welcome!
References
1. Hirsch, J. E.,
“Pair production and ionizing radiation from superconductors”, http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0508529
Comments
Post a Comment
Please leave your comments on this topic: