Skip to main content

Cuneiform to Computers and the MAA Lattice Points Problem

Imagine living thousands of years ago in ancient Sumeria as a mathematician.  Your medium for storing infomration is cuneiform on clay tablets.  As you work, you stamp each equation into wet clay by making wedge shaped marks using the blunt end of a reed to make a finished document that looks like this (picture 1)[1]



When your instructor tells you to investigate the properties of a table of let's say, a hundred numbers or so, you might sigh in resignation, and plan on having results by sometime next week.

With the advent of paper and pencil, things become much easier.  There's still lots of work to be done, but the recording of the information so that it can be viewed and worked with is, comparatively speaking, a piece of cake.

Finally, though, the computer comes along and getting a table of 100 numbers is more like playing.  With +The SageMathCloud  the 100 number task suggested in the +Mathematical Association of America video below can be done easily by anyone with a web browser.  Watch the video[2] and then read on for an example of just that.



The problem is to figure out the maximum slope, a, for a line described by y = 2 + m*x where 1/2 < m < a.  The game is that the line cannot intersect with any lattice points.  These are points where the x and y coordinates both have integer values.  The first minute or so of the video has a great illustration of this.  So, we don't want to hit any of the blue lattice points shown in picture 2 as we crank up the slope of the line to the value m < a.

Dr. Tanton suggested that we take a look at the value of the line with slope m = 1/2 and how far it was from each of the lattice points directly above it out to the x coordinate of 100.  Here's the graph of the m = 1/2 line as well as the lattice points that we need to avoid as we crank the slope up from 1/2. (picture 2)



and, here's the sage code if you'd like to play with it



Now, instead of figuring out the slope that would hit each successive 'bad' lattice point, we can have Sage do it for us, and dump it out as a list of slopes at each point.  Cick the blue button below for the table of slopes necessary to just hit each lattice point.  In other words, by staying less than each successive slope, we can just miss that lattice point.



We see that the slope which will hit the 99th lattice point we're trying to miss is 50/99.  So, in the problem as asked, the maximum the slope, a can be is a < 50/99.

Another snazzy thing we can look at is how the maximum slope progressed as we went from lattice point to lattice point out towards 99.  Here's the graph: (picture 3)


Here's the Sage code used to generate it.  Remember you can modify the sage code in any of these cells and hit the blue button again to find out what effect your modifications had.

References:
1.  http://books.google.com/books?id=i-juAAAAMAAJ&pg=PR3#v=onepage&q&f=false

2.  Video
http://youtu.be/j2J6NEGTMsY

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the  +Sage Mathematical Software System  today, (the files been  added to the public repository [3]).  If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica.  Oh, and it' free.  I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory.  What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly.  Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in...