Alcubierre Derivations in Open Access

I was able to play with the Alcubierre warp drive derivations for a bit today! I'm still trying to absorb all the niceties, but here's what I understand so far. I'm just getting started on all of this and everything is very shaky. So, please, anyone who happens to be familiar with oh, I don't know, the 3+1 formalism of GR say, please feel free to jump in. Actually the more involvement the merrier, whether it be with suggestions, corrections, or questions.

Which brings up the Alcubierre github repository[1]. I went ahead and made an open access github project that for the moment holds only a mathematica file with the derivation details I've been able to compile so far, a wiki, and one open issue, (the space curvature graph looks a little too jaggy). Here's the graph by the way, king of the 'Hello World' moment for Alcubierre work I suppose, (picture 1):

I'd hoped to have more to say about this tonight, but hopefully I can check in again tomorrow when I have a firmer grip on all of this and a bit more coherent one at that, (late night last night).

//Scraggly notes for tomorrow.....
Alcubierre uses a 3+1 formalism. This means that space is assumed to exist in constant time slices, one slice for each instant of time. He furthermore makes space flat. In doing this, he shows that the line element, (the Pythagorean formula for spacetime), indicates that the space will be 'globally hyperbolic' and therefore can't violate causality, in other words, you can't go back in time and prevent your own birth. the way I'm interpreting this is that if I have to move along a hyperbolic path, (picture 2 the red curves are the hyperbolas), in my coordinate system, then I can't execute a close curve, and I can't get back to where I started, (time-wise).

References:
1. github repository
https://github.com/hcarter333/alcubierre

Comments

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the +Sage Mathematical Software System today, (the files been added to the public repository [3]). If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica. Oh, and it' free. I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory. What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly. Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1. While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero. This is typically explained in the following way. While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare. That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2]. Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector. Its operation is in...

Copasetic Flow

Search This Blog