Skip to main content

Takeno Scooped by Thirty Years and Keeping the Line Element Simple Special Rel Style

One major mistake was pointed out in my work on the Takeno line element from yesterday[6].  When working on a theory that describes the behavior of physical quantities with respect to velocity, (like special relativity), don't decompose the velocity into its components like distance and time, or in my case into angular displacement, and time.  Just leave omega, (angular velocity), as omega!  Since omega isn't one of the variables that the derivatives are being taken with respect to, the many terms due to chain ruling out the innards of the hyperbolic trig functions disappeared and the phi and time components of the line element as calculated by Takeno fell out pretty simply.


I also found out last night while reading through one of the Takeno referencing articles[5] I mentioned a few days ago that Takeno was scooped on his transform by about thirty years.  As it turns out, Phillip Franklin[2], (picture 2), a then recent PhD from Princeton, beat Takeno to the punch in 1922[3, open access!].  Franklin was a mathematician by training and did his PhD thesis under Veblen on the four color problem.  Veblen is also interesting because he wrote a book on projective geometry[4, open access], a topic which turns up more or less subtly all over relativity.

As it turns out Takeno wrote more about the relativity than just the Takeno transforms.  Here's an open access example in which he wrote about spherically symmetric space-times[1].  He also helped to develop something called Wave Geometry.  I haven't been able to get my hands on any of the sources that contain Takeno writing on wave geometry yet, but here's what Gibbons had to say about it[7]

"Conformal Killing spinors of course arise naturally in conformal supergravity [16]. As a further illustration  of historical antecedents, it is interesting to recall that the existence of solutions to an equation of the form (2) was the basic assumption behind the theory of “Wave Geometry” which was extensively developed in Hiroshima in the ’30.s.  The introduction to [38] describing the history of these ideas and the fate of those working on them seems to me to be one the most poignant in the physics literature."
References:
1.  Takeno on space-times
http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.jmsj/1261734863

2.  Franklin biography
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Biographies/Franklin.html

3.  Franklin's transforms
http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/84534.pdf?acceptTC=true

4.  Veblen's book on projective geometry
https://archive.org/details/117714799_001

5.  Article referencing Takeno and Franklin
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1208.1913.pdf

6.  Takeno line element recalculation begins
http://copaseticflow.blogspot.com/2014/03/re-calculating-takeno-line-element.html

7.  Gibbons on Takeno and wave geometry
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.1206.pdf?origin=publication_detail

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the  +Sage Mathematical Software System  today, (the files been  added to the public repository [3]).  If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica.  Oh, and it' free.  I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory.  What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly.  Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in...