Special Relativity and Hyperbolic Trigonometric Functions

Just a few brief notes on circular and hyperbolic trigonometry today. First, if there's anyone who'd like to offer, any clarifications, expansions, or other cool and interesting facts, please, you're more than welcome! As usual, this is stuff that I learned in high school that didn't become blindingly clear and meaningful until it cropped up in grad school physics. First, the equations for the circle and the hyperbola (picture 1)

Notice that they differ only by a single negative sign. Now, for their graphs, (picture 2).

Each of these figures can also be expressed in parametric form as follows, (this is where the trigonometric and hyperbolic trig functions come in). (picture 3)

Now for the notes and other thoughts.

Angular Arc Length and Angular Area
Until just a few weeks ago, I had always wondered why the inverse trig functions were called arcsine, and arccosine. The answer makes perfect sense, it just hadn't occurred to me. The arc prefix indicates that the function returns the arc length around the unit circle for the angle whose value of sine, (for example), is the input to the function. A numeric example shows it pretty well. Suppose we take a right angle, equal to pi/2 in radians, and calculate it's sine. The value returned will be 1, and obviously if I plug that into arcsine, I'll get back the angle, pi/2, but.... On the unit circle, the angle is also equal to the arc length around the circle, (circumference from the x axis to the angle), so while it's true that arcsine returns the angle for the value of sine it's given, it's also returning the arc length around the circle for that angle, hence the name.

Hyperbolic trig functions share a similar property, their inverse function return the area between the x axis and an angle line drawn out to the hyperbola from the origin. In the figure shown from Wikipedia[1], the red area is equal to half the angle returned by arcsinh for the hyperbolic angle measured by the line from the origin to the hyperbola.

Here's where we get into the stuff I don't know enough about yet, but which makes for interesting extra reading.

Geometric Algebra
David Hestenes has been writing about geometric algebra and how it can be applied to better understand physics since the mid '60s [2]. His articles are very, very interesting, and I highly recommend them and wish I had more time to read through them. In each of his articles on geometric algebra, the fact that the square root of -1, i, can be interpreted geometrically as an area or volume always comes up. I don't know if one has anything to do with the other, (and I don't have time to check right now which is part of why I'm recording these speculative notes here), but hyperbolic sine and cosine can be represented in the following form using complex numbers

So, we have sine and cosine sprinkled with imaginary numbers and we wind up with something that traces out area rather than arc length.

The Special Relativity Angle
You might have noticed that the infinitesimal line length mentioned in the gamma derivation post a few days back[3] looked kind of like the Pythagorean theorem, but with a few minus signs that didn't quite fit.

These minus signs essentially put calculations in special relativity into a hyperbolic, or Minkowski, geometry[4], and the end result is the use of hyperbolic trigonometric functions throughout. More about this soon.

References:
1. Wikipedia on hyperbolic trigonometric funcitons
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_sine

2. Hestenes' Oersted medal lecture
http://dx.doi.org/10.1119%2F1.1522700
Hestenes D. (2003). Oersted Medal Lecture 2002: Reforming the mathematical language of physics, American Journal of Physics, 71 (2) 104. DOI: 10.1119/1.1522700

open access
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?HestenesOerstedMedalLecture

3. Rindler's derivation of gamma
http://copaseticflow.blogspot.com/2013/06/rindlers-just-flat-out-pretty.html

4. On Minkowski geometry
http://www.dynamicgeometry.com/documents/advancedSketchGallery/minkowski/Minkowski_Overview.pdf

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1. While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero. This is typically explained in the following way. While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare. That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2]. Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector. Its operation is in concept very sim

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain

More Cowbell! Record Production using Google Forms and Charts

First, the what : This article shows how to embed a new Google Form into any web page. To demonstrate ths, a chart and form that allow blog readers to control the recording levels of each instrument in Blue Oyster Cult's "(Don't Fear) The Reaper" is used. HTML code from the Google version of the form included on this page is shown and the parts that need to be modified are highlighted. Next, the why : Google recently released an e-mail form feature that allows users of Google Documents to create an e-mail a form that automatically places each user's input into an associated spreadsheet. As it turns out, with a little bit of work, the forms that are created by Google Docs can be embedded into any web page. Now, The Goods: Click on the instrument you want turned up, click the submit button and then refresh the page. Through the magic of Google Forms as soon as you click on submit and refresh this web page, the data chart will update immediately. Turn up the:

Copasetic Flow

Search This Blog