Skip to main content

Lab Outtakes: The 25 kHz AC Magnetic Field Superconductor Levitation Run

Not Very Educational, Just Pretty
I'm a little crunched for time since today's a travel day, so to get things started back off, here's a question.  What do the two pictures below have to do with each other?


Maglev trains like the one announced this week by Japan, (shown on the left), use pairs of superconductors and magnets to levitate.  Testing has to be done to ensure that the levitation won't become unstable because of mechanical vibrations or stray magnetic fields.  The picture on the right is a capture from the lab outtake video shown below.  The video is from a playday, but the apparatus was used in an experiment[1] that characterized the levitation of a superconductor by an alternating current magnetic field.

As quantitative data, the video is fairly useless because I'm changing way to many variables at once.  It's fun for me at least to see all the things going on.  Oh yeah, please excuse my super-classy super-scientific use of the phrase 'crappy signal'.

What you're looking at is a small pair of magnets levitated above a superconductor contained in the Styrofoam cup of liquid nitrogen.  The cup is sitting atop an electromagnet that's being driven with 25 kHz current.  As the current is increased, you'll see the magnet begin to lose stability as it's effected by the increasing field from the solenoid.  A while later, you'll see the liquid nitrogen begin to heat up and boil off because of the heat generated by the solenoid's iron core.  The boiling off utlmiately makes a pretty little dithered fog over the cup.  Finally, there's a surprise at the end.  I'll leave it at this, the superconductor itself isn't very sensitive to the 25 kHz magnetic field.  However, when I ramp down the current I'm superimposing  an apparent current that vibrates at only a few Hz.  The superconductor sees that and reacts.




References:

1.  Paper on levitation in an AC magnetic field
http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.1870

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the  +Sage Mathematical Software System  today, (the files been  added to the public repository [3]).  If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica.  Oh, and it' free.  I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory.  What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly.  Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in...