Skip to main content

Israel Senitzky and Coherent/Glauber States

Here are a few quick notes on what might become my next history of physics presentation.  Does anyone know more about the history of Dr. Senitzky and coherent states?

I'm still studyinng for my quantum II pre-midterm this week.  Looking for more material on quantum operators, I performed a search for quantum operators in the American Jouranl of Physics which led to an article about the harmonic oscillator wave packet.  Since harmonic oscillators are one of the favorite subjects in both of my quantum classes, I and II, I read on.  The author, Saul Epstein of the University of Nebraska, mentioned that while several authors covered the Gaussian wave packet as an example of a wave function that will not change shape in a harmonic oscillator potential well,  I. R. Senitzky[2] (picture 1) had shown using the Schrodinger formalism that there were actually an infinite number of such non-shape changing packet wave functions.

Switching over to Dr. Senitzky's article, in the Physical Review[3], I began to pick up on the fact that what were called non-shape changing wavefunctions in 1954 we now call coherent, or Glauber states.  My interest was further piqued by the fact that Senitzky was working at the Signal Corps Engineering Laboratories in Fort Monmouth, New Jersey, the same place where my dad went to Signal Corp school when he was in the Army in the '60s.  Curious as to why Glauber states had been worked in the Signal Corp in 1954, I quickly popped over to Glauber's article on coherent states[4] to see if he referenced Senitzky.  He did not.  As an aside, Glauber's article is excellent!  It has a very nice review of  quantum electrodynamics in the first few sections.

I then did an internet search on Dr. Senitzky.  Other than a few interesting tidbits of trivia, (see below), all I could find was that in the early 1950's he served as what appears to have been an adminstrative reviewer of the Columbia Radiation Laboratory, (CRL) for the Signal Corps.  The reference I found didn't mention Senitzky doing any science at all.

The Interesting Stuff and Questions
A second review of Senitzky's article, turned up the acknowledgement of Julian Schwinger shown below (picture 2)


While the Senitzky's article didn't discuss QED or QFT at all, Schwinger was instrumental in both these fields.  A review of Senitzky's other papers between 1945 and 1960[5] turns up a number of papers about the interaction of electrons and quantum effects in electromagnetic fields and spontaneous emission.  In the late 1950's his work turned mostly towards masers.  Interestingly, masers were developed at the CRL in the early 50's, during the same time period that Senitzky was responsible for reviewing the lab.  A review of the coherent states article on Wikipedia turned up the diagram and caption shown to the left (picture 3).  In 1961, two years before Glauber's article, Senitzky published an abstract in Proceedings of the 15th annual Frequency Control Symposium that mentions

"...the noise temperature due to spontaneous emission
can be made much smaller than [hbar omega over k] while adequate gain is maintained."

Was Senitzky doing theoretical work on masers as early as 1954?  The main focus of CRL at the time was supposed to be magnetron tubes and it's obvious from some of Senitzky's papers that he was working on those.  Magnetrons, however, do not employ coherent wave packets.  The only record I can find of his activities right now indicates that his interest in CRL and their maser program was purely administrative.  This all raises a number of questions.

1.  Just for historical interest, how did Senitzky come to be working for the Army Signal Corps?  What was his role there?

2.  How was he associated with Schwinger?  Was it through the MIT Radiation Laboratory, (another military radar lab)?

3.  Was Senitzky in fact doing theoretical maser coherent state work?

4.  Why wasn't he referenced in Glauber's article?

Interesting Trivia and Addendums
Glauber would go on to win the Nobel prize for his work in 2005[9].

 Senitzky was a boy prodigy violinist who received a scholarship to Julliard at the age of 13[7].

Senitzky's daughter was an MD who pioneered the treatment of menopause using testosterone and was featured in People magazine[8].

References:

 1.  http://ajp.aapt.org/resource/1/ajpias/v27/i5/p291_s1

2.  http://physics.usc.edu/Faculty/Senitzky/

3.  http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v95/i5/p1115_1

4.  http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v130/i6/p2529_1

5.  http://scholar.google.com/scholar?as_q=&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=%22IR+Senitzky%22&as_publication=&as_ylo=1945&as_yhi=1960&btnG=&hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C44

6.  http://books.google.com/books?id=6pN_j7PctKYC&lpg=PA285&ots=3vfQUyvgPI&dq=Israel%20Senitzky%20signal%20corp&pg=PA285#v=onepage&q=Israel%20Senitzky%20signal%20corp&f=false

7.  http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=r-1OAAAAIBAJ&sjid=XEwDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3038%2C2841355

8.  http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20127693,00.html

9.  http://physics.aps.org/story/v16/st13

Picture of the Day:
From 2/11/13
Labels:

Comments

  1. AnonymousJanuary 4, 2024 at 3:12 AM

    This was my grandfather. He was an amazing man!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. antigrav_kids KD0FNRJanuary 4, 2024 at 6:47 AM

      That is very cool! Any idea of what path led him to the Signal Corp job?

      Delete
    2. AnonymousJanuary 4, 2024 at 9:53 AM

      My father was a theoretical physicist at the research division of the signal corps Fort Monmouth for almost 30 years, starting when he pursued his PhD at Columbia University He published numerous papers in the journals of the Physical Review After early retirement he continued his research at the Technion in Israel and then at the University of Southern California. Up until his death he continued pursuing his work always engrossed in the problems he so loved and according to a colleague was “brilliant” at.

      Delete
    3. antigrav_kids KD0FNRJanuary 4, 2024 at 11:59 AM

      Thanks very much for the information! History of Physics has been a hobby/research interest of mine since I was in grad school for Physics.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Please leave your comments on this topic:

Popular posts from this blog

More Cowbell! Record Production using Google Forms and Charts

First, the what : This article shows how to embed a new Google Form into any web page. To demonstrate ths, a chart and form that allow blog readers to control the recording levels of each instrument in Blue Oyster Cult's "(Don't Fear) The Reaper" is used. HTML code from the Google version of the form included on this page is shown and the parts that need to be modified are highlighted. Next, the why : Google recently released an e-mail form feature that allows users of Google Documents to create an e-mail a form that automatically places each user's input into an associated spreadsheet. As it turns out, with a little bit of work, the forms that are created by Google Docs can be embedded into any web page. Now, The Goods: Click on the instrument you want turned up, click the submit button and then refresh the page. Through the magic of Google Forms as soon as you click on submit and refresh this web page, the data chart will update immediately. Turn up the:
Post a Comment
Read more

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain
10 comments
Read more

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very sim
Post a Comment
Read more