Guinness and the Physics of the Bubbly Flow

This month's lead paper in the American Journal of Physics[8] regards a subject that is dear to most grad students hearts, beer. A team of scientists Limerick, Ireland report on research they did to determine why the bubbles near the wall of a pint glass of Guinness flow down instead of up. The preprint[1] of the article can be found on arXiv. The article inoduces fluid mechanics of the physics of the 'bubbly flow'. In addition to the bubbly flow, the article introduces the 'anti-pint' (picture 1). One wonders if the phrase was coined while the research team[4] performed the experimental portion of their work, measuring the settling time of a Guinness Stout.

If you have a fear of fluid mechanics like I did until today, then this article is an excellent gentle introduction to the subject. In terms of their relation to your Guinness, the article introduces the Reynolds number[2], the ratio of inertial to viscous forces in a fluid flow, and the Bond number[3], a parameter that defines the weight (pun intended), of gravity on the shape of a bubble, and Stokes Formula[6] to determine the drag force on bubbles in the beer.

The article surmises that the downward flow of bubbles is due to the Boycott Effect[5] discovered by Dr. Boycott in 1920. If you've ever wondered why the doctor in medical dramas holds the test tube of blood at an angle, there's actually a reason. The tilt influences the flow of sediment, (blood corpuscles in this case), and the settling time is reduced. An example of this is shown in the video of Guinness in a tube below[7].

References:

1. The article in question on arXiv:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.5233

2. Reynolds Number:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reynolds_number

3. Bond Number:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E%C3%B6tv%C3%B6s_number

4. About the research team:
http://www3.ul.ie/wlee/sinking_bubbles.html

5. Boycott Effect:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v104/n2621/abs/104532b0.html

6. Stokes' Formula
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stokes%27_law

7. The tilted Guiness video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2_V2MRNlZOs

8. The AJP article
http://ajp.aapt.org/resource/1/ajpias/v81/i2/p88_s1

On waves in Guiness:
http://www.chem.ed.ac.uk/guinness/waves.pdf

Comments

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the +Sage Mathematical Software System today, (the files been added to the public repository [3]). If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica. Oh, and it' free. I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory. What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly. Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...

How Many Files Can You Add to a GPT Project? An Interview with GPT-5 on Limits, Context Engineering Tips, and Chats

Setting the scene: I’m tinkering with Project TouCans, knee-deep in radio logs, SQLite dumps, and Cesium code. Naturally, I’m wondering if shoving all this into one GPT Project is a recipe for brilliance… or for disaster. So I turn to Vril — you know, after Brainy from the Legion of Super-Heroes , because what else do you call your AI sidekick who always has the answers? Time to ask him straight up. [ As an aside, yes, GPT-5 has decided to sometimes call me Vail. I'm not sure why to be honest. Also, I asked Vril, er GPT-5, to write up our interview for me. Apparently, me asking it to 'Bro' up a few stories, just for fun, has convinced Vril that I use 'Like,' more than I actually might. ] Me (Vail): So Vril, how many files can I throw into a GPT Project before it just starts choking? Like, is there some magic number where the context window taps out and everything falls apart? GPT-5 (Vril): Great question. There’s no single hard file limit. What matters is ...

Copasetic Flow

Search This Blog