Getting Started with Amateur Satellites and Satellite Mapping

Progress! See Part II.
I'm helping to plan an amateur radio special event on November 5th to raise awareness of the effort by The Friends of Science East to save Tesla's last lab, Wardenclyffe, in Shoreham, NY. One idea for the event is to operate from some of the buildings that Tesla occupied either as labs or as homes in Manhattan. I'm thinking an easy means of operation from there might be satellite. This brings up the interesting question of "which satellites are visible from which rooftops?" I've perused the net a bit and haven't found a program that will display amateur satellite orbits in relation to the NYC skyline, so I decided to plunk around and see if I could come up with my own. So far, I have a list of references I intend to start with and I know what technology I'm going to try to use.

Google Earth is now avaiable on web pages as a JavaScript plugin. I'll be using that as the programming framework. The docs for the portion of the API I plan on using can be found at:
http://code.google.com/apis/earth/documentation/geometries.html

Satellite trajectories are described by Keplerian data. The Keplarian data for amateur satellites is availabe at:
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/ftp/keps/current/nasa.all

Amsat also has an fb explanation of the Keplerian data elements at:
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/keps/kepmodel.html

The author of the site http://www.barnabu.co.uk has already written a great satellite debris tracking framework I'll be using as a code basis. To see more about it, go to:
http://www.barnabu.co.uk/satellite-collision-debris-tracking-in-the-google-earth-plug-in/

For an in-depth description of the algorithms used in the code, check out Wikipedia at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplified_Perturbations_models

Finally, if you just absolutely positively have to find an amateur satellite right now, then the site you want is the excellent one by N2Y0.

Comments

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the +Sage Mathematical Software System today, (the files been added to the public repository [3]). If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica. Oh, and it' free. I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory. What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly. Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1. While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero. This is typically explained in the following way. While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare. That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2]. Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector. Its operation is in...

Copasetic Flow

Search This Blog