Skip to main content

Understanding Spherical Gradients

Previously we looked at where the 1/r term comes from in the gradient in cylindrical coordinates. This time, we're looking at the gradient for spherical coordinates.



The spherical coordinate values are shown in the figure below. The new theta coordinate is another angular coordinate similar to the phi coordinate introduced in the cylindrical system. It's angle sweeps down from the positive z axis of the Cartesian coordinate system to the negative z axis. Theres a another change. Instead of being anchored on the z axis and moving up and down, the r coordinate is anchored permanently at the coordinate origin.



In this coordinate system, the the angle theta and the radial direction sweep out circles in vertical planes similar to the horizontal plane circles discussed in the cylindrical case. Because of this, the theta coordinate has the same 1/r multiplier discussed in the cylindrical case.

phi and r sweep out circles in horizontal planes exactly as in the cylindrical system. But now, the radius of the circles are not just dependent on the value of r anymore. They also depend on the value of theta. If theta is zero radians, then the circle swept out by r and phi is a point, a circle with 0 radius. If theta is pi/2 radians, then the circle swept out by r and phi actually has a radius of r. The figure below shows a view of the relation ship between r and theta. The phi circles are swept out by the radial line with lenght r and angle theta from the z axis.



Because phi no longer sweeps out circles with radius r, but with radius r sin theta, it's element of length change must be modified in the same manner and we get the length factor assciate with the phi coordinate shown in the gradient above.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Cowbell! Record Production using Google Forms and Charts

First, the what : This article shows how to embed a new Google Form into any web page. To demonstrate ths, a chart and form that allow blog readers to control the recording levels of each instrument in Blue Oyster Cult's "(Don't Fear) The Reaper" is used. HTML code from the Google version of the form included on this page is shown and the parts that need to be modified are highlighted. Next, the why : Google recently released an e-mail form feature that allows users of Google Documents to create an e-mail a form that automatically places each user's input into an associated spreadsheet. As it turns out, with a little bit of work, the forms that are created by Google Docs can be embedded into any web page. Now, The Goods: Click on the instrument you want turned up, click the submit button and then refresh the page. Through the magic of Google Forms as soon as you click on submit and refresh this web page, the data chart will update immediately. Turn up the:

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very sim