Mars -- Debunking the Debunkers

In any scientific investigation, it's always important to keep an open mind. Otherwise, the important details can sneak right by while you're too busy hollering that they don't exist.

I've been researching dugg reports of strange phenomena lately. Things like the woman, the canals, and the face on Mars.

Just about as often as there is a report of a strange phenomenon, there's another report that claims to debunk it. In reading these 'debunkings' I noticed that most of them use the same logical fallacy. It's called the 'argument from fallacy', and here's how it works:

If P, then Q.
P is a fallacious argument.
Therefore, Q is false.

And here's a further example from wikipedia:

Tom: "All cats are animals. Ginger is an animal. This means Ginger is a cat.".
Bill: "Ah you just committed the affirming the consequent logical fallacy. Sorry, you are wrong, which means that Ginger is not a cat".Of course, Ginger could be a cat. We don't have enough data in either argument to know. And that's the important part, we don't have enough data.

The following highlights how this logical fallacy is used in regards to Mars observations.

The Canals on Mars

Initial Report: "Channels have been observed on Mars."

Second Report: The 'canals' may have been used by a higher civilization on Mars to move water.

And now, the argument by fallacy:

Argument by Fallacy: Because it is believed that there can't be water on Mars, the canals could not have carried water, therefore there can't be any canals.

What? The existence of a canal or channel is not predicated by the existence of water to put in it. But, water was later discovered on Mars as well as a network of geographic features that are popularly known as lava tubes.

The Lady on Mars

Recent reports highlighted a picture where a rock feature on Mars looks very much like the statue of a woman with an outstretched arm.
This was summarily debunked as well. How?

Initial Report: An interesting rock feature has been spotted on Mars. It looks remarkably like a woman.

Second Report: The feature is a woman!

Argument by Fallacy: The feature couldn't possibly be a woman because it's only four inches tall, therefore, the feature can have nothing to do with the shape of a woman, and is simply a pareidolia, the tendency of humans to derive meaning from vague images.

Again, what!? Because somebody claims the feature is something it can't be, that means it's nothing at all?

And finally:The Face on Mars

We've all heard about this one since the '70s. How is it debunked? Here goes:

Initial Report: There's a geographic feature on Mars that looks like a face.

Second Report: Humans can see faces where there aren't any, for example, in clouds.

Argument by Fallacy: Humans can see faces where there aren't any, therefore, if humans see a face on Mars, there can't be one there.

Do any of these features imply something is going on on Mars? I don' know. The point is, neither does anybody else.

More Cowbell! Record Production using Google Forms and Charts

First, the what : This article shows how to embed a new Google Form into any web page. To demonstrate ths, a chart and form that allow blog readers to control the recording levels of each instrument in Blue Oyster Cult's "(Don't Fear) The Reaper" is used. HTML code from the Google version of the form included on this page is shown and the parts that need to be modified are highlighted. Next, the why : Google recently released an e-mail form feature that allows users of Google Documents to create an e-mail a form that automatically places each user's input into an associated spreadsheet. As it turns out, with a little bit of work, the forms that are created by Google Docs can be embedded into any web page. Now, The Goods: Click on the instrument you want turned up, click the submit button and then refresh the page. Through the magic of Google Forms as soon as you click on submit and refresh this web page, the data chart will update immediately. Turn up the:

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1. While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero. This is typically explained in the following way. While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare. That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2]. Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector. Its operation is in concept very sim

Copasetic Flow

Search This Blog