Skip to main content

Chess and Emotional Learning Leaps

After listening to a talk at one of our local libraries yesterday, five year-old No. 2 and three year-old No. Three asked to stop into the adjoining chess room for a game before they headed back out.  In the past, Three has usually devolved into tears upon losing her first piece, so I figured the game would be quick.  "Sure, you can play until somebody screams." was my answer.

Much to my surprise, Three and Two had matured immensely over the last few months!  Not too long into the game, Three did in fact lose a pawn.  It was no big deal though, she kept right on playing!  Two quickly remastered how all the pieces moved, and then started helping Three.

Even more surprising, Three started telling me about his strategy of bringing his pawns out while leaving his queen, a bishop, and all the pawns in front of them behind to 'protect that guy', (that'd be the king).  He'd internalized what his mom had shown him months earlier and was now putting it to use.  He had paid attention!

When Two was Three's age, we didn't play many board games as he was quick to anger if things didn't go well.  He's grown out of that, but the whole experience seems to have left him with a burgeoning sense of empathy.  Without any gain to himself, he was helping Three along, occasionally pointing out to her that he'd placed a piece in a position where she could nab it.  He was keeping the game fun for her so he could keep playing.  Three may be the most emotionally intelligent of the lot of us.

As the game neared its end, I looked down at the pieces, realized that Three could win the whole thing in one move, and tried to explain.  I reminded her that the objective was to get Two's king.  I reminded her how bishops move, (diagonally across corners).  Finally I pointed out to her how her bishop would be pointed straight through the single diagonal gap in Two's king's defensive wall.  Three decided to take a pawn instead.  Like any good unschooling parent I backed off.

On the next round of moves Three did manage to get Two's king into check.  Two moved the king out of danger, and we hit the first snag of the game.  Three was disappointed that Two wouldn't just give her his king, and tried to liken the whole situation to sharing.  “Clearly Three should share his king with her.”  I thought we’d finally hit the snag I’d originally feared.  I was wrong.  She accepted the game wasn’t about sharing, put her head down, took a few deep breaths, and lo and behold... she carried on!

 In the end, Two won.  For me, that wasn't really the point though.  I'd walked into a chess match thinking I'd be out in a few minutes.  Instead, I was treated to the delightful experience of watching two kids grow right before my eyes!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Cowbell! Record Production using Google Forms and Charts

First, the what : This article shows how to embed a new Google Form into any web page. To demonstrate ths, a chart and form that allow blog readers to control the recording levels of each instrument in Blue Oyster Cult's "(Don't Fear) The Reaper" is used. HTML code from the Google version of the form included on this page is shown and the parts that need to be modified are highlighted. Next, the why : Google recently released an e-mail form feature that allows users of Google Documents to create an e-mail a form that automatically places each user's input into an associated spreadsheet. As it turns out, with a little bit of work, the forms that are created by Google Docs can be embedded into any web page. Now, The Goods: Click on the instrument you want turned up, click the submit button and then refresh the page. Through the magic of Google Forms as soon as you click on submit and refresh this web page, the data chart will update immediately. Turn up the:

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very sim