Skip to main content

Magnet Design and Sample Size

I've been looking lately at using an already constructed superconducting magnet instead of building my own for the upcoming experiment, (an Experimental Search for the Bremsstrahlung Radiation Predicted by the Hole Theory of Superconductivity)[1].  The issue at hand is that the bore isn't large enough to accept the originally planned 3.8 cm radius spherical Pb sample.  I took a look this morning at what reducing the sample size would do to the energy of the predicted radiation in electron volts as well as what the dependency of the radiation flux would be with respect to sample size.  The two formula for the energy and the flux (pictures 1 and 2) are:

See the aforementioned proposal as well as reference 2 for more details.

Plotting each of these versus R, the radius of the sample gave the following plots, (pictures 3 and 4).  If the radius is reduced all the way down to 2 cm, the fall off in energy isn't unacceptable.  It still lands in the ballpark of 160 keV which should light up the NaI detector just fine.  Where I run into trouble is in the flux.  Because of the R squared dependency it goes down by a factor of three.

For the moment, it looks like a better choice to build a magnet.  That gets us to the fun part!  Superconducting magnets are awesome!  With 153 turns of .0018 in. diameter superconducting wire, I should be able to get approximately, (using the infinitely long solenoid approximation), 1300 Gauss.  The approximation isn't quite valid since my solenoid will be pretty far from being significantly longer than it is wide, however, the required field strength is only 800 Gauss.  For a first cut, things are looking pretty good.

Apologies for the xkcd style graphs.  It occurred to me this morning, that the xkcd package is the only one I know how to label plots in.

1.  Experimental proposal and such

2.  Paper on radiation predicted by the hole theory of superconductivity
Hirsch J. (2003). Charge expulsion and electric field in superconductors, Physical Review B, 68 (18) DOI:


Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla

to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.

What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:

2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:

3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:

How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

Lost Phone

We were incredibly lucky to have both been in university settings when our kids were born.  When No. 1 arrived, we were both still grad students.  Not long after No. 2 arrived, (about 10 days to be exact), mom-person defended her dissertation and gained the appellation prependage Dr. 

While there are lots of perks attendant to grad school, not the least of them phenomenal health insurance, that’s not the one that’s come to mind for me just now.  The one I’m most grateful for at the moment with respect to our kids was the opportunities for sheer independence.  Most days, we’d meet for lunch on the quad of whatever university we were hanging out at at the time, (physics research requires a bit of travel), to eat lunch.  During those lunches, the kids could crawl, toddle, or jog off into the distance.  There were no roads, and therefore no cars.  And, I realize now with a certain wistful bliss I had no knowledge of at the time, there were also very few people at hand that new what a baby…

Lab Book 2014_07_10 More NaI Characterization

Summary: Much more plunking around with the NaI detector and sources today.  A Pb shield was built to eliminate cosmic ray muons as well as potassium 40 radiation from the concreted building.  The spectra are much cleaner, but still don't have the count rates or distinctive peaks that are expected.
New to the experiment?  Scroll to the bottom to see background and get caught up.
Lab Book Threshold for the QVT is currently set at -1.49 volts.  Remember to divide this by 100 to get the actual threshold voltage. A new spectrum recording the lines of all three sources, Cs 137, Co 60, and Sr 90, was started at approximately 10:55. Took data for about an hour.
Started the Cs 137 only spectrum at about 11:55 AM

Here’s the no-source background from yesterday
In comparison, here’s the 3 source spectrum from this morning.

The three source spectrum shows peak structure not exhibited by the background alone. I forgot to take scope pictures of the Cs137 run. I do however, have the printout, and…