Skip to main content

Open Science is Cool in Concept, but What About Practice

First, the really great news!  My research proposal won first place at the Texas Academy of Sciences meeting on Friday!  That means I've got the money to purchase liquid helium and play with a superconductor this summer.  The proposal can be viewed below on the blog, or you can grab it from [1] if you're reading this somewhere else.

Now, the question.  I've been reading lots of posts from G+ers like +Mark Hahnel+Laura Wheeler, and +Emily Coren on the value of open access and communicating science to the public.  I'm thinking of doing something cool like Google+er +Katrina Badiola has done with her lab notebooks.  I'm curious how this works out and what experience people have had with it.  If you can answer any of the following questions, that would be awesome!  If you'd like to answer anonymously, leave and anonymous comment on the blog post.

What do you think the benefits of an entirely open access scientific process are?  
Can it build a more diverse team of collaborators/colleagues?  Does anyone have examples of this?  Can it serve to interest people in the STEM fields?  If so, how should it best be done to make integrate/interest the public with the project?  Are there any books or articles already written about doing something like this?  Is there any value in publishing a meta-report on how the project fared with open access, (in addition to the scientific reporting of course).  If so, are there metrics that should be measured to this end?  What are the other benefits?


Is there a down side?
Are there portions of a project that just shouldn't be made open access?  Can open access lead to endless discussions on the validity of a step in a project, or the validity of an entire project?  Should researchers be concerned that other researchers will 'scoop' them by having access to their day to day activities?  Is there a stigma to open access?  Can it effect reviewers of scientific papers that are aware the project was open access?  I've read that there are demographics of scientists that are not overwhelmed by the concept of open access or science available via the internet.

The Poposal




References:
1.  Proposal
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B30APQ2sxrAYSWR5bkdwdFF3d28/edit?usp=sharing


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla



to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.



What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:



2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:



3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:



How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

Lost Phone

We were incredibly lucky to have both been in university settings when our kids were born.  When No. 1 arrived, we were both still grad students.  Not long after No. 2 arrived, (about 10 days to be exact), mom-person defended her dissertation and gained the appellation prependage Dr. 

While there are lots of perks attendant to grad school, not the least of them phenomenal health insurance, that’s not the one that’s come to mind for me just now.  The one I’m most grateful for at the moment with respect to our kids was the opportunities for sheer independence.  Most days, we’d meet for lunch on the quad of whatever university we were hanging out at at the time, (physics research requires a bit of travel), to eat lunch.  During those lunches, the kids could crawl, toddle, or jog off into the distance.  There were no roads, and therefore no cars.  And, I realize now with a certain wistful bliss I had no knowledge of at the time, there were also very few people at hand that new what a baby…

Lab Book 2014_07_10 More NaI Characterization

Summary: Much more plunking around with the NaI detector and sources today.  A Pb shield was built to eliminate cosmic ray muons as well as potassium 40 radiation from the concreted building.  The spectra are much cleaner, but still don't have the count rates or distinctive peaks that are expected.
New to the experiment?  Scroll to the bottom to see background and get caught up.
Lab Book Threshold for the QVT is currently set at -1.49 volts.  Remember to divide this by 100 to get the actual threshold voltage. A new spectrum recording the lines of all three sources, Cs 137, Co 60, and Sr 90, was started at approximately 10:55. Took data for about an hour.
Started the Cs 137 only spectrum at about 11:55 AM

Here’s the no-source background from yesterday
In comparison, here’s the 3 source spectrum from this morning.

The three source spectrum shows peak structure not exhibited by the background alone. I forgot to take scope pictures of the Cs137 run. I do however, have the printout, and…