Skip to main content

Open Science is Cool in Concept, but What About Practice

First, the really great news!  My research proposal won first place at the Texas Academy of Sciences meeting on Friday!  That means I've got the money to purchase liquid helium and play with a superconductor this summer.  The proposal can be viewed below on the blog, or you can grab it from [1] if you're reading this somewhere else.

Now, the question.  I've been reading lots of posts from G+ers like +Mark Hahnel+Laura Wheeler, and +Emily Coren on the value of open access and communicating science to the public.  I'm thinking of doing something cool like Google+er +Katrina Badiola has done with her lab notebooks.  I'm curious how this works out and what experience people have had with it.  If you can answer any of the following questions, that would be awesome!  If you'd like to answer anonymously, leave and anonymous comment on the blog post.

What do you think the benefits of an entirely open access scientific process are?  
Can it build a more diverse team of collaborators/colleagues?  Does anyone have examples of this?  Can it serve to interest people in the STEM fields?  If so, how should it best be done to make integrate/interest the public with the project?  Are there any books or articles already written about doing something like this?  Is there any value in publishing a meta-report on how the project fared with open access, (in addition to the scientific reporting of course).  If so, are there metrics that should be measured to this end?  What are the other benefits?

Is there a down side?
Are there portions of a project that just shouldn't be made open access?  Can open access lead to endless discussions on the validity of a step in a project, or the validity of an entire project?  Should researchers be concerned that other researchers will 'scoop' them by having access to their day to day activities?  Is there a stigma to open access?  Can it effect reviewers of scientific papers that are aware the project was open access?  I've read that there are demographics of scientists that are not overwhelmed by the concept of open access or science available via the internet.

The Poposal

1.  Proposal


Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla

to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.

What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:

2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:

3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:

How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though!

Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very simpl…

Unschooling Math Jams: Squaring Numbers in their own Base

Some of the most fun I have working on math with seven year-old No. 1 is discovering new things about math myself.  Last week, we discovered that square of any number in its own base is 100!  Pretty cool!  As usual we figured it out by talking rather than by writing things down, and as usual it was sheer happenstance that we figured it out at all.  Here’s how it went.

I've really been looking forward to working through multiplication ala binary numbers with seven year-old No. 1.  She kind of beat me to the punch though: in the last few weeks she's been learning her multiplication tables in base 10 on her own.  This became apparent when five year-old No. 2 decided he wanted to do some 'schoolwork' a few days back.

"I can sing that song... about the letters? all by myself now!"  2 meant the alphabet song.  His attitude towards academics is the ultimate in not retaining unnecessary facts, not even the name of the song :)

After 2 had worked his way through the so…