Skip to main content

Liquid Nitrogen, Water, Conductivity, and the new Data Acq System

There's all kinds of stuff going on today as I try to get the apparatus ready to go to measure the amplitude of the magnetic field required for levitation at each frequency.

First, the levitation detector on the sample holder.
Building the levitation detector on the sample holder and the liquid nitrogen reservoir didn't work out nearly as well as I'd hoped that it might.  First you ask, what's a levitation detector?  Up until now, I've been determining the moment of levitation after the experiment by making videos that watch the superconductor as the AC magnetic field is increased.  This was fine until I wanted to know what the magnitude of the voltage seen on the pick-up coil used to detect the levitation magnetic field was at the exact moment the superconductor first levitated.  There were a number of problems with doing this with cameras, the least of which was actually needing two cameras.

I came up with a system of attaching a piece of aluminum foil to the boom, (the Bic pen portion of the torsion balance), and supporting the boom on the points of two wires.  The two wires were connected to five volts and and one of the digital inputs of the Arduino respectively.  When the superconductor was not levitating, the aluminum foil on the boom would sit on the two wires completing the circuit and maintaining a digital high input on the Arduino pin, (see the picture below).  When the superconductor levitated, the aluminum foil on the boom was lifted off  the two wires, the connection was broken, the Arduino saw a digital low input and subsequently lit an LED.   This mechanism made or broke a connection to a five volt source that the Arduino system could watch.  When the connection was broken, the Arduino turned on an LED.

I had intended to make a brief video this week showing that liquid nitrogen does not conduct, (I did by the way), but I got a lesson on the conductance of water vapor this morning.  The short version of the story: distilled or pure water does not conduct.  The  two wires shown above near the pivot of the boom were originally placed on the edge of the reservoir.  That close to the liquid nitrogen, there was a significant build-up of ice on the contacts.  As the ice built up, the switching mechanism stopped working.  Moving the entire switch back on the boom fixed the problem.  A picture of the reservoir edge configuration is shown below.

You might also notice that the final implementation has one of the contacts cupping the boom.  With the two point configuration, the boom could acutually rest on one point without making contact with the other.

Modifying the Pick-Up Coil
The original pick-up coil was abandoned for a coil that could be used during the experiment.  The original coil had to be moved on and off of the magnet and with the initial lev switch on the reservoir implementation, this was no longer convenient.  The pick-up coil now consists of two turns of wire wound directly on the magnets windings at the top of the magnet.

Actual Data!
Finally, late in the afternoon, most of the switch issues were worked out and the data shown below was taken.  The graph shows the peak voltage measured from the pick-up coil when levitation was obtained.  For the frequencies where there are two points, the lower voltage is where levitation was first achieved, as detected by the blinking activation of the LED.  The higher voltage is where steady levitation was achieved as indicated by the steady activation of the LED.  So far, there are only three frequencies, more work will be done to fill in the gaps.

The voltage measured should be proportional to the magnetic field.  This needs to be calibrated.  For now, the data gives a good idea of the relative relation between required field strength and frequency.

The torsion balance rests on a laboratory jack.  The jack is lowered before each measurement until the LED indicating that the boom has risen off the switch activates.  The jack is then raised until the LED  is extinguished.  This is done to minimize the distance the superconductor must be levitated to activate the LED.

The superconductor is allowed to transition to room temperature for three minutes between measurements. The superconductor is immersed in liquid nitrogen for three minutes before each measurement is taken.  The heating cycle is included to remove any pinned flux in the superconductor that might be present from the previous measurement.

Sources of error:
The jack adjustment is may change the height of the superconductor with respect to the magnet.  There is a known dependency between levitation force and the distance between the superconductor and the magnet..

Ice is building up on the sample holder during some runs.  This will change the effective mass that is to be levitated by the magnetic field.

Heated Ferromagnetic Core
At one point during the day, there appeared to have been too much heating of the electromagnet's core.  The waveforms measured by the pickup coil for the overheated core are shown below:

and now the waveform form the pickup coil when the core wasn't overheated:

I believe the overheated waveform was due to hysteretic losses in the core, but I'm not sure and more work needs to be done to confirm this.

Random data notes
1080 601 - 100 Hz. minimum steady lift

1080 605 - 200 Hz.  first lev
1080 607 - 200 Hz. first steady lev

no lev at 300 Hz moving to 25 Hz increments about 200 Hz.

1080 610 - 225 Hz. first lev also steday lev

250 Hz. no lev


Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla

to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.

What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:

2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:

3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:

How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though!

Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very simpl…

Unschooling Math Jams: Squaring Numbers in their own Base

Some of the most fun I have working on math with seven year-old No. 1 is discovering new things about math myself.  Last week, we discovered that square of any number in its own base is 100!  Pretty cool!  As usual we figured it out by talking rather than by writing things down, and as usual it was sheer happenstance that we figured it out at all.  Here’s how it went.

I've really been looking forward to working through multiplication ala binary numbers with seven year-old No. 1.  She kind of beat me to the punch though: in the last few weeks she's been learning her multiplication tables in base 10 on her own.  This became apparent when five year-old No. 2 decided he wanted to do some 'schoolwork' a few days back.

"I can sing that song... about the letters? all by myself now!"  2 meant the alphabet song.  His attitude towards academics is the ultimate in not retaining unnecessary facts, not even the name of the song :)

After 2 had worked his way through the so…