Skip to main content

What Unschooling Isn't

Tonight, a few brief notes on what unschooling isn’t.  I don’t mean to be bit unctuous, but here goes anyway.  I see—a lot—that unschooling kids never learn anything what with all the sitting around doing nothing, and eating candy all the time.  I believe these statements are mostly in reaction to ‘radical’ unschoolers who say things like, “The kids eat whatever they want, and pursue their own interests.”
These sorts of statements are true, but not necessarily in the way they’re taken.  Yup, some unschoolers eat  whatever they want.  Why, oh why, would that be candy though?  First, you have to ask yourself, where’d they get this candy?  If there’s no candy in the house, they’d have to go outside to get it, and that contradicts the other ‘unschooling premise’, ‘they do nothing all the time.’

Let me break it down simply.  Unschoolers don’t sit around and eat candy all day for two reasons.  The first reason is that an emotionally healthy person allowed to make their own decisions won’t eat candy all the time because it doesn’t feel good, whether your a kid or an adult.  Go ahead, eat candy all day for a day, see how you feel the next day.  It won’t be great.  The second reason they don’t eat candy all the time when told they ‘can eat whatever they’d like,’ is because there’s very probably no candy in the house.

Unless an unschooling kid happens to be cooking for themselves, they live with the same limitations of family dining as everyone else, food is prepared, food is presented.  ‘They can eat whatever they want,’ means—more precisely—‘You can eat the food or not.  There it is.’

OK, so I’ve addressed candy eating—at least to my satisfaction.   Let’s hit the ‘doing nothing’ assertion.  Again, it’s easy to see how this statement comes from the things us unschooling parents say, things like, “The kids learn what they want when they’re interested.”  This should not, however, translate in any way to “They sit around and do nothing.”

Again, I’ll point out some context.  It seems very unlikely to me that any well-regulated human, allowed to be in control of their lives would sit around doing nothing for long.  They’ll do things that interest them.  So, assuming ‘unschooling kids control their learning environment’ means ‘unschooling kids do nothing’ perhaps says more about the people who make the assumption than it does about the typical unschooling kid.

Even leaving self-directed learning out of the mix, do most unschooling kids really have the opportunity to do nothing?  The simple answer is no.  Unschooling parents constantly find new opportunities to expose the kids in their charge to things that they might develop an interest in.  Is it teaching in the public school sense of the word?  No.  Is it doing nothing?  Not by a long stretch.

So, if you happen to see ribald assertions about unschooling that don’t seem to make sense, ask yourself a few questions.  First: Is the lifestyle described something that could be reasonably attributed to a healthy person in charge of their own life?  Second: “Is the person making the assertion assuming they’re talking about a catered to, spoiled kid, or are they assuming they’re talking about a person living a rational life with all of a rational life’s usual limitations?

Unschooling kids live in the same world as every adult in their community.  If you’re looking for the kids that are catered to, perhaps the public school system would be a better place to start.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla



to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.



What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:



2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:



3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:



How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

Lab Book 2014_07_10 More NaI Characterization

Summary: Much more plunking around with the NaI detector and sources today.  A Pb shield was built to eliminate cosmic ray muons as well as potassium 40 radiation from the concreted building.  The spectra are much cleaner, but still don't have the count rates or distinctive peaks that are expected.
New to the experiment?  Scroll to the bottom to see background and get caught up.
Lab Book Threshold for the QVT is currently set at -1.49 volts.  Remember to divide this by 100 to get the actual threshold voltage. A new spectrum recording the lines of all three sources, Cs 137, Co 60, and Sr 90, was started at approximately 10:55. Took data for about an hour.
Started the Cs 137 only spectrum at about 11:55 AM

Here’s the no-source background from yesterday
In comparison, here’s the 3 source spectrum from this morning.

The three source spectrum shows peak structure not exhibited by the background alone. I forgot to take scope pictures of the Cs137 run. I do however, have the printout, and…

Unschooling Math Jams: Squaring Numbers in their own Base

Some of the most fun I have working on math with seven year-old No. 1 is discovering new things about math myself.  Last week, we discovered that square of any number in its own base is 100!  Pretty cool!  As usual we figured it out by talking rather than by writing things down, and as usual it was sheer happenstance that we figured it out at all.  Here’s how it went.

I've really been looking forward to working through multiplication ala binary numbers with seven year-old No. 1.  She kind of beat me to the punch though: in the last few weeks she's been learning her multiplication tables in base 10 on her own.  This became apparent when five year-old No. 2 decided he wanted to do some 'schoolwork' a few days back.

"I can sing that song... about the letters? all by myself now!"  2 meant the alphabet song.  His attitude towards academics is the ultimate in not retaining unnecessary facts, not even the name of the song :)

After 2 had worked his way through the so…