Skip to main content

Two More Tensor Identities, and then Special Relativity Next! EM II Notes 2014_08_22

Summary:  Still More Tensor Identities
Three more identities with gradients, divergences, Laplacians, and cross products.  Later today, the fun stuff, special relativity begins!


$\vec{A} \cdot \left(\vec{B} \times \vec{C}\right) = \vec{B} \cdot \left(\vec{C} \times \vec{A}\right)$

$= A_i \epsilon_{ijk} B_j C_k$

As long as we only cycle the indices in the Levi-Civita symbol, we won't cause a sign change, so the above is also equal to

$= A_k \epsilon_{ijk} B_i C_j$

Which we can commute to get

$= B_i \epsilon_{ijk} C_j A_k = \vec{B} \cdot \left(\vec{C} \times \vec{A}\right)$


Done!


$\vec{\nabla} \cdot \left(\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A} \right) = 0$

$=\partial_i \epsilon_{ijk} \partial_j A_k$
$= 0$

If $i$ and $j$ are equal, then the Levi-Civita evaluates to zero.  If they are not equal, then swapping the two indices produces the same mixed partial derivative result, but with a negative sign inserted by swapping indices in the Levi-Civita symbol.  These equal but opposite terms all sum to zero giving the advertised result.


$\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{\nabla} \times \vec{A} = \vec{\nabla}\left(\vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{A}\right) - \nabla^2 \vec{A}$

$= \epsilon_{lmi} \partial_m \epsilon_{ijk} \partial_j A_k$

Don't let all the dels, nablas, whatever you'd like to call them, throw you off.  At the end of the day, this is just the same as the $\vec{A} \times \vec{B} \times \vec{C}$ example.  Use the two Levi-Civitas to four deltas identity.

$= \epsilon_{lmi} \partial_m \epsilon_{ijk} \partial_j A_k = \epsilon_{ijk} \partial_j \epsilon_{lmk} \partial_l A_m  = \left(\delta_{il}\delta_{jm} - \delta_{im}\delta_{jl}\right)\partial_j\partial_l A_m$

$=\delta_{il}\delta_{jm}\partial_j\partial_l A_m - \delta_{im}\delta_{jl}\partial_j\partial_l A_m$

$= \partial_i \partial_j A_j - \partial_j \partial_j A_i = \vec{\nabla}\left(\vec{\nabla}\cdot \vec{A}\right) - \nabla^2 \vec{A}$

Picture of the Day:
Hiking trail near Redwood City, CA

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Cowbell! Record Production using Google Forms and Charts

First, the what : This article shows how to embed a new Google Form into any web page. To demonstrate ths, a chart and form that allow blog readers to control the recording levels of each instrument in Blue Oyster Cult's "(Don't Fear) The Reaper" is used. HTML code from the Google version of the form included on this page is shown and the parts that need to be modified are highlighted. Next, the why : Google recently released an e-mail form feature that allows users of Google Documents to create an e-mail a form that automatically places each user's input into an associated spreadsheet. As it turns out, with a little bit of work, the forms that are created by Google Docs can be embedded into any web page. Now, The Goods: Click on the instrument you want turned up, click the submit button and then refresh the page. Through the magic of Google Forms as soon as you click on submit and refresh this web page, the data chart will update immediately. Turn up the:

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very sim