Skip to main content

Leak Detector Testing... Again Lab Book 2014_07_27


Summary:
The leak detector stopped working correctly several weeks ago.  It didn't exactly depart his mortal coil so much as just stop being useful.  Sort of like a major league baseball catcher hunkered in a hockey goal.  It looks sort of like it has the right equipment, but it obviously incapable of performing it's tasks in any sort of meaningful way.  It boils down to this, the mechanical roughing pump is still pulling a vacuum that should enable the diffusion pump, responsible for doing the detailed vacuum work, to switch on, and yet the diffusion pump abjectly refuses.

If you're new to the experiment, the background of what's going on here in broad strokes can be found at the bottom of the post.

Lab Book 2014_07_25     Hamilton Carter

Leak Detector Work

Leak detector testing was resumed.  The first test was to check the vacuum on the end of the vacuum hose coming from the roughing pump and normally attached to the diffusion pump, but now attached to a thermocouple gauge.  The vacuum pulled down to 150 mTorr after several minutes.

The second test was to move the roughing pump path selector from the right hand path to the diffusion pat as shown in the figure above to the left hand path into the space evacuated for leak detection.  To do this, the smaller knob is turned clockwise until the white dot on its face points along the left hand path  Their was no vessel to be leak detected attahced on the left hand path.  The path was merely attached to the thermocouple gauge.  The vacuum pulled down to 30 mTorr in less than a minute.  After two more minutes, the pressure was down to 27 mTorr.  Checking the right hand path again after this, it was found that the vacuum pulled down to 50 mTorr.  The hose connection to the thermocouple gauge may have been leaky.

Next, the hose form the roughing pump was reattached to the diffusion pump  The pump was run for a minute or so on the right hand path attachd to the diffusion pump.  There is no guage attached to that side to read the vacuum, so after the first minute, the path knob was changed to the left hand path.  The thermococuple guage indicated a vacuum of < 10 mTorr immediately.  After another minute, the vacuum was down to 4 mTorr.  During this test, the built-in meter shown above read a pressure of .4 mBar.

The large valve knob that opens the diffusion pump to the left hand path was opened.  No change in the vacuum was observed.  In a later run, a brief change in vacuum to a pressure of 11 mTorr was observed but after 1.5 seconds, the pressure reduced again to its original value. 

To make sure the valves were working correctly, the trap was opened as a coarse check of its vacuum pressure.  There was an inrush of air consistent with the vessel holding a vacuum before being opened.

The indicator light for < 10^-2 on the panel of the leak detector was never lit.  It’s beginning to appear that either the pressure gauge built into the leak detector is broken, or there is damage to the control circuits that light the indicator on the front panel.  I don’t believe the bulb is out because the diffusion pump never heated up, even after being plugged back into power.


Background
Hirsch's theory of hole superconductivity proposes a new BCS-compatible model of Cooper pair formation when superconducting materials phase transition from their normal to their superconducting state[1].  One of the experimentally verifiable predictions of his theory is that when a superconductor rapidly transitions, (quenches), back to its normal state, it will emit x-rays, (colloquially referred to here as H-rays because it's Hirsch's theory).

A superconductor can be rapidly transitioned back to its normal state by placing it in a strong magnetic field.  My experiment will look for H-rays emitted by both a Pb and a YBCO superconductor when it is quenched by a strong magnetic field.
This series of articles chronicles both the experimental lab work and the theory work that’s going into completing the experiment.

The lab book entries in this series detail the preparation and execution of this experiment… mostly.  I also have a few theory projects involving special relativity and quantum field theory.  Occasionally, they appear in these pages.

Call for Input
If you have any ideas, questions, or comments, they're very welcome!

References
1.  Hirsch, J. E., “Pair production and ionizing radiation from superconductors”, http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0508529 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla



to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.



What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:



2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:



3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:



How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

Lost Phone

We were incredibly lucky to have both been in university settings when our kids were born.  When No. 1 arrived, we were both still grad students.  Not long after No. 2 arrived, (about 10 days to be exact), mom-person defended her dissertation and gained the appellation prependage Dr. 

While there are lots of perks attendant to grad school, not the least of them phenomenal health insurance, that’s not the one that’s come to mind for me just now.  The one I’m most grateful for at the moment with respect to our kids was the opportunities for sheer independence.  Most days, we’d meet for lunch on the quad of whatever university we were hanging out at at the time, (physics research requires a bit of travel), to eat lunch.  During those lunches, the kids could crawl, toddle, or jog off into the distance.  There were no roads, and therefore no cars.  And, I realize now with a certain wistful bliss I had no knowledge of at the time, there were also very few people at hand that new what a baby…

Lab Book 2014_07_10 More NaI Characterization

Summary: Much more plunking around with the NaI detector and sources today.  A Pb shield was built to eliminate cosmic ray muons as well as potassium 40 radiation from the concreted building.  The spectra are much cleaner, but still don't have the count rates or distinctive peaks that are expected.
New to the experiment?  Scroll to the bottom to see background and get caught up.
Lab Book Threshold for the QVT is currently set at -1.49 volts.  Remember to divide this by 100 to get the actual threshold voltage. A new spectrum recording the lines of all three sources, Cs 137, Co 60, and Sr 90, was started at approximately 10:55. Took data for about an hour.
Started the Cs 137 only spectrum at about 11:55 AM

Here’s the no-source background from yesterday
In comparison, here’s the 3 source spectrum from this morning.

The three source spectrum shows peak structure not exhibited by the background alone. I forgot to take scope pictures of the Cs137 run. I do however, have the printout, and…