Skip to main content

Can crusher you say?

This is just a quick post to point out that what I thought might be the bane of the H-ray project's existence two days ago my in fact be its saving grace.  Reading more about the can crusher built at the University of Maryland in 1994[1], I came across the following graph.



It appears that the apparatus can generate a greater than 10 kGauss field in under 40 microseconds.  We only require 800 Gauss, so the maximum field seems like a bit of overkill... until you start thinking about the required uniformity of the magnetic field used to make our superconducting sample quench.  Ideally, we'd like to have the entire sample quench at once leaving the spin currents hypothesized by Hirsch nowhere to go.  Hirsch[4] theorizes that the collapsing spin currents are responsible for the Bremsstrahlung radiation, (known as H-rays around here).  By quenching the spin currents everywhere in the superconductor, the number of  H-rays produced should be maximized.

Creating a uniform field of 800 Gauss or so over the entire sample which is a 3.8 cm radius sphere of lead is rather difficult to do using a simple solenoid.  It was this fact that led me to consider using the iron yoke magnet I spoke about in the last post[2].



While the rate of change of magnetic field is distressingly small with this magnet, at least the field is uniform over almost the entire 7.5 cm radius of the pole face, guaranteeing that the whole sample will quench at once,albeit slowly.

This brings us back to the can crusher coil.  It's a rather diminutive little coil consisting of only three turns as designed at U. Maryland.  It does however pack up to a 20 kGauss wallop at its center!  The question is, can it quench the entire volume of the sample at once?  I ran some numbers through our Mathematica[3] solenoid model and came up with the following graph


The y axis is in units of kGauss, the x axis is in units of meters.  The blue curve represents the magnetic field at the center of the solenoid, which is centered at x = 0 and perpendicular to the x axis.  The purple line is the field in kGauss required to quench the lead sample.  The field is high enough throughout the sample!

Of course, this brings back the can crusher issues of the last post in spades, but we can always switch over to an unsilvered fiberglass Dewar and avoid them!

References:
1.  AJP can crushing article, (sadly not open access)
http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapt/journal/ajp/62/1/10.1119/1.17739

2.  Previous post
http://copaseticflow.blogspot.com/2014/05/h-rays-mounting-dewar-in-magnet.html

3.  Mathematica code
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B30APQ2sxrAYUDlfdTdJLVBBZEU/edit?usp=sharing

4.  Open access version of Hirsch's article on ionizing radiation from superconductors
http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0508529

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the  +Sage Mathematical Software System  today, (the files been  added to the public repository [3]).  If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica.  Oh, and it' free.  I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory.  What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly.  Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in...