Skip to main content

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though!

Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very simple.  Construct a loop of wire and then wait for a magnetic monopole to fall through the loop and generate a current.  As described in a review article in Nature[3] the detectors work in the same fashion as the original experiment done by Faraday which showed that when the end of a magnet is pushed through a coil of wire an electric current is induced in the wire. (picture 2)



After recording data for a little more than 120 days, the experiment saw the signal shown in picture 3.  The signal, (shown in the lower half of the picture), is compared to other jiggles in the experimental data caused by known possible sources of error.


No other signals were ever recorded.  In the end, the event was written off as more than likely being caused by trapped magnetic flux in the detector's superconducting loop creeping its way through the detection circuitry.

And of course, there's a gravity probe B[1] connection.  To shield the detector from stray magnetic fields not caused by magnetic monopoles, an apparatus was used that was originally designed to shield the prototypes of the superconducting gyroscopes that would ultimately be used on the spacecraft to detect Earth's gravitomagnetic field.



References:
1.  Fairbank and Gravity Probe B

2.  Cabrera's candidate monopole
Cabrera B. (1982). First Results from a Superconductive Detector for Moving Magnetic Monopoles, Physical Review Letters, 48 (20) 1378-1381. DOI:

3.  Nature review of magnetic monopoles
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038%2F344706a0
Frisch H.J. (1990). Quest for magnetic monopoles, Nature, 344 (6268) 706-707. DOI:



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla



to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.



What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:



2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:



3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:



How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

Kids R Kapable

Just a little note to concerned ‘grownups’ everywhere.  If you look at a kid—and I mean really look—I don’t mean notice a person shorter than you, I mean make eye contact, notice their facial expression and observe their body language—If you look at a kid, don’t assume they need your help unless they’re obviously distressed, or ask for it.  You might think this is difficult call to make.  You might think, not having kids of your own, that you’re unable to make this determination.  You are.  You do in fact, already have the skills even if you’ve never been around kids  It’s a remarkably simple call to make, just use the exact same criteria you would for determining if an adult was in distress.  Because, guess what, kids and adults are in fact the same species of animal and communicate in the same way.  Honest.  If someone—adult or child—doesn’t need your help, feel free to say hello, give a wave, give a smile, but don’t—do not—try to force help on anyone that doesn’t want or need it.



Y…