Skip to main content

Beta Decay and Neutrinos over Cocktails

This was going to be so much longer and more detailed, but as you may or may not be aware, seven month olds occasionally decide of their own volition to pull all nighters, (much like grad students).  So, I leave you with a few somewhat less than scattered thoughts, and an incredible video on the topic of neutrinos.

After yesterday's post on the possibility of the variation of radioactive decay rates with neutrino activity from the sun, I spent my free time today reading about beta decay and neutrinos.  The references I mention below are very complete, but this post won't be.  I present to you a series of notes and factoids about beta decay and the history of the neutrino, kind of a backgrounder for cocktail party level discussions of the topic if you will.

Beta Decay
I wanted to look into beta decay first because it's the type of radioactive decay, (as opposed to alpha or gamma), that involves neutrinos.  It seemed like the natural place to start.  Since we're talking about the possibility of neutrinos effecting a decay process, why not look at the decay process that emits neutrinos?  The standard type of beta decay that most people are familiar with is electron emission beta decay (picture 1).  In this type of decay, a neutron in the radioactive atom decays into a proton and emits an electron and an electron anti-neutrino in the process.  There's an awesome television show produced by the BBC detailing the experimental discovery of both the neutrino and neutrino oscillations, (more on these below).  +Oliver Thewalt pointed the show out to me on youtube[5].


There are two other types of beta decay, one that is more or less a mirror image of the one described above in which a positron and an electron neutrino are emitted, and the weird K capture one.  In K capture, the nucleus grabs an electron out of the innermost electron shell, turning into an atom with an atomic charge of one less, (the negative electron charge cancels one of the proton charges), and emits an electron neutrino.  This is also the electron capture process often mentioned in LENR[7] research that seems to have so peeved the author of this Physics Central article[6] on the subject.

Neutrino Oscillations or "No Virginia, Light Doesn't Perceive Time"
As a last note today, the video mentioned above pointed out that there are three types of neutrinos named after the three types of electron-like particles known as leptons.  There's the electron neutrino I mentioned above as well as a muon neutrino and a tau neutrino.  First, the littlest bit of background.  The familiar electron is related to two heavier particles  the muon, and the tau.  The electron, muon, and tau all behvae in the same manner, but each one is significantly more massive than the one before it.  Each of these partcles is associated with the neutrinos already mentioned.

The fascinating thing is that a neutrino that starts out as one flavor, (electron, muon, or tau), will oscillate into the other two flavors and back over time.  This was a huge surprise to the physics community because it was originally thought that neutrinos were massless.  As a massless particle, the neutrino, like a photon, (the massless particle that transmits light), should move at the speed of light.  The physicists in the BBC video point out that if the neutrino actually moved at the speed of light then it would not be able to perceive time, (according to special relativity), and therefore not be able to change its flavor over time.  From this it was deduced that the neutrino must in fact have mass and travel slightly slower than the speed of light.  This is all very cool, and yet another example of light speed particles not perceiving time, something I wrote about in a cautionary tale on another site[8].


References:
1.  First detection of free neutrinos
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126%2Fscience.124.3212.103
Cowan C.L., Reines F., Harrison F.B., Kruse H.W. & McGuire A.D. (1956). Detection of the Free Neutrino: a Confirmation, Science, 124 (3212) 103-104. DOI:

3.  Much more useful, (and open access), annotated version of the same picture on Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FirstNeutrinoEventAnnotated.jpg

4.  Article on the early history of neutrino experiments
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126%2Fscience.203.4375.11
Reines F. (1979). The Early Days of Experimental Neutrino Physics, Science, 203 (4375) 11-16. DOI:

5.  BBC show on the discovery of the neutrino and neutrino oscillations
http://youtu.be/Xemmtr2X9yY

6.  Physics Central on LENR
http://physicsbuzz.physicscentral.com/2013/04/nasas-cold-fusion-folly.html


7.  Widom and Larsen on low energy nuclear reactions.  This appears to be open access.
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s2006-02479-8

8.  On not being overly mean in science
http://chipdesignmag.com/carter/2013/03/21/fringe-science-and-the-science-of-meanness/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla



to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.



What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:



2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:



3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:



How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though!

Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very simpl…

Kids R Kapable

Just a little note to concerned ‘grownups’ everywhere.  If you look at a kid—and I mean really look—I don’t mean notice a person shorter than you, I mean make eye contact, notice their facial expression and observe their body language—If you look at a kid, don’t assume they need your help unless they’re obviously distressed, or ask for it.  You might think this is difficult call to make.  You might think, not having kids of your own, that you’re unable to make this determination.  You are.  You do in fact, already have the skills even if you’ve never been around kids  It’s a remarkably simple call to make, just use the exact same criteria you would for determining if an adult was in distress.  Because, guess what, kids and adults are in fact the same species of animal and communicate in the same way.  Honest.  If someone—adult or child—doesn’t need your help, feel free to say hello, give a wave, give a smile, but don’t—do not—try to force help on anyone that doesn’t want or need it.



Y…