Skip to main content

More on Benchtop Gravitational Redshift Measurements and Schleich's Talk Today

By the end of the day today, I'll have two practice presentations for the APS TX Section meeting this weekend that I'd really appreciate any feedback on, I'll be building them between some pretty cool meetings today.  Here's some more on one of the meetings...

I get to see Dr. Schleich's talk on his gravitational red shift vs. gravitational accelerometer calculation[3][4] with respect to the KC interferometer, (picture 1), [2].  The authors of KC interferometer experiment claimed that it measured the gravitational redshift, or time dilation due to curved space time.  In his PRL paper, Dr. Schelich points out that by analyzing the KC interferometer by looking at the commutators of it's time evolution operators, one can avoid choosing a representation and show that the shift in phase of the atoms in the KC interferometer is due to the acceleration of the atom caused by the gravitational potential, and not due to the gravitational red shift.

Here are some references to come up to speed/review all of this

+Jonah Miller does a great job of describing the gravitational redshift[5].  Dr. Greenberger points out[1], (did I mention that this article is really, really good?) that the  gravitational redshift and the twin paradox are two sides of the same coin.  You can check out my recent meanderings on the twin paradox inspired by Brian Green's explanation[6].  The neturon interferometer can also be used to look at the gravitational Aharanov-Bohm effect.  For more information on this, once again check out [1], there are also more references pointed out here[7].

Finally, an interesting bit of trivia I hadn't realized.  The C in the KC interferometer is Steven Chu, the United States Secretary of Energy, (picture 2).  References follow.

1.  Greenberger on the neutron interferometer
Greenberger D. (1983). The neutron interferometer as a device for illustrating the strange behavior of quantum systems, Reviews of Modern Physics, 55 (4) 875-905. DOI:

2.  The KC interferometer in Nature
Müller H., Peters A. & Chu S. (2010). A precision measurement of the gravitational redshift by the interference of matter waves, Nature, 463 (7283) 926-929. DOI:

3.  Dr. Schleich's PRL paper
Schleich W.P., Greenberger D.M. & Rasel E.M. (2013). Redshift Controversy in Atom Interferometry: Representation Dependence of the Origin of Phase Shift, Physical Review Letters, 110 (1) DOI:

4. Dr. Schleich's arXiv paper

5.  Physics Mill on the gravitational redshift

6.   Copasetic Flow on the twin paradox

7.  Copasetic Flow on the gravitational Aharanov-Bohm effect


Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla

to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.

What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:

2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:

3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:

How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

Lab Book 2014_07_10 More NaI Characterization

Summary: Much more plunking around with the NaI detector and sources today.  A Pb shield was built to eliminate cosmic ray muons as well as potassium 40 radiation from the concreted building.  The spectra are much cleaner, but still don't have the count rates or distinctive peaks that are expected.
New to the experiment?  Scroll to the bottom to see background and get caught up.
Lab Book Threshold for the QVT is currently set at -1.49 volts.  Remember to divide this by 100 to get the actual threshold voltage. A new spectrum recording the lines of all three sources, Cs 137, Co 60, and Sr 90, was started at approximately 10:55. Took data for about an hour.
Started the Cs 137 only spectrum at about 11:55 AM

Here’s the no-source background from yesterday
In comparison, here’s the 3 source spectrum from this morning.

The three source spectrum shows peak structure not exhibited by the background alone. I forgot to take scope pictures of the Cs137 run. I do however, have the printout, and…

Unschooling Math Jams: Squaring Numbers in their own Base

Some of the most fun I have working on math with seven year-old No. 1 is discovering new things about math myself.  Last week, we discovered that square of any number in its own base is 100!  Pretty cool!  As usual we figured it out by talking rather than by writing things down, and as usual it was sheer happenstance that we figured it out at all.  Here’s how it went.

I've really been looking forward to working through multiplication ala binary numbers with seven year-old No. 1.  She kind of beat me to the punch though: in the last few weeks she's been learning her multiplication tables in base 10 on her own.  This became apparent when five year-old No. 2 decided he wanted to do some 'schoolwork' a few days back.

"I can sing that song... about the letters? all by myself now!"  2 meant the alphabet song.  His attitude towards academics is the ultimate in not retaining unnecessary facts, not even the name of the song :)

After 2 had worked his way through the so…