Skip to main content

Dark Matter and Spacecraft Flyby Anomalies

A number of sources[2][3] today reported on the possible detection of dark matter particles or WIMPs from the CDMS II experiment.  This is pretty slick for a number of reasons.  First, one of the research teams on the CDMS II experiment is located right here at Texas A&M.  Second, the other dark matter experiment that's mentioned in the nature blog, LUX, also has a team of researchers working here at A&M.   I was sitting in a professor's office discussing using liquid helium as a scintillator for the h-ray experiment a few days ago and he mentioned their use of liquid xenon as a scintillator on LUX, and now this!  For those interested, liquid xenon makes a better scintillator than liquid helium for a few reasons.  The most interesting of these to me is that helium is small enough to penetrate into a photomultiplier tube and ruin it's vacuum over time.  Basically, it's very hard to keep helium from penetrating containers.

What about the spacecraft flyby anomalies?
Finally, there's the association between dark matter and the spacecraft flyby anomalies I mentioned in my previous post[4].  I mentioned a paper[1] by Adler that studied whether or not spacecraft flyby anomalies might the result of interactions with dark matter.  The predictions for dark matter mass from Adler's paper do not match the mass measured in the data reported from CDMS II experiment today.  Adler's paper calls for a dark matter particle with a mass below 1 GeV, (look for the white asterisk in picture 1).  The CDMS II data implies a particle mass of roughly 8.6 GeV.  So, for now, no confirmation of any spacecraft interacting with dark matter halos.


1.  Adler on flyby anomalies and dark matter mass
Adler S. (2009). Can the flyby anomaly be attributed to earth-bound dark matter?, Physical Review D, 79 (2) DOI: 

2.  Nature blog on the WIMP data

3.  CMDS II paper

4.  Flyby anomalies and dark matter post


Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla

to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.

What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:

2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:

3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:

How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

Lost Phone

We were incredibly lucky to have both been in university settings when our kids were born.  When No. 1 arrived, we were both still grad students.  Not long after No. 2 arrived, (about 10 days to be exact), mom-person defended her dissertation and gained the appellation prependage Dr. 

While there are lots of perks attendant to grad school, not the least of them phenomenal health insurance, that’s not the one that’s come to mind for me just now.  The one I’m most grateful for at the moment with respect to our kids was the opportunities for sheer independence.  Most days, we’d meet for lunch on the quad of whatever university we were hanging out at at the time, (physics research requires a bit of travel), to eat lunch.  During those lunches, the kids could crawl, toddle, or jog off into the distance.  There were no roads, and therefore no cars.  And, I realize now with a certain wistful bliss I had no knowledge of at the time, there were also very few people at hand that new what a baby…

Lab Book 2014_07_10 More NaI Characterization

Summary: Much more plunking around with the NaI detector and sources today.  A Pb shield was built to eliminate cosmic ray muons as well as potassium 40 radiation from the concreted building.  The spectra are much cleaner, but still don't have the count rates or distinctive peaks that are expected.
New to the experiment?  Scroll to the bottom to see background and get caught up.
Lab Book Threshold for the QVT is currently set at -1.49 volts.  Remember to divide this by 100 to get the actual threshold voltage. A new spectrum recording the lines of all three sources, Cs 137, Co 60, and Sr 90, was started at approximately 10:55. Took data for about an hour.
Started the Cs 137 only spectrum at about 11:55 AM

Here’s the no-source background from yesterday
In comparison, here’s the 3 source spectrum from this morning.

The three source spectrum shows peak structure not exhibited by the background alone. I forgot to take scope pictures of the Cs137 run. I do however, have the printout, and…