Skip to main content

Dark Matter and Spacecraft Flyby Anomalies

A number of sources[2][3] today reported on the possible detection of dark matter particles or WIMPs from the CDMS II experiment.  This is pretty slick for a number of reasons.  First, one of the research teams on the CDMS II experiment is located right here at Texas A&M.  Second, the other dark matter experiment that's mentioned in the nature blog, LUX, also has a team of researchers working here at A&M.   I was sitting in a professor's office discussing using liquid helium as a scintillator for the h-ray experiment a few days ago and he mentioned their use of liquid xenon as a scintillator on LUX, and now this!  For those interested, liquid xenon makes a better scintillator than liquid helium for a few reasons.  The most interesting of these to me is that helium is small enough to penetrate into a photomultiplier tube and ruin it's vacuum over time.  Basically, it's very hard to keep helium from penetrating containers.

What about the spacecraft flyby anomalies?
Finally, there's the association between dark matter and the spacecraft flyby anomalies I mentioned in my previous post[4].  I mentioned a paper[1] by Adler that studied whether or not spacecraft flyby anomalies might the result of interactions with dark matter.  The predictions for dark matter mass from Adler's paper do not match the mass measured in the data reported from CDMS II experiment today.  Adler's paper calls for a dark matter particle with a mass below 1 GeV, (look for the white asterisk in picture 1).  The CDMS II data implies a particle mass of roughly 8.6 GeV.  So, for now, no confirmation of any spacecraft interacting with dark matter halos.


1.  Adler on flyby anomalies and dark matter mass
Adler S. (2009). Can the flyby anomaly be attributed to earth-bound dark matter?, Physical Review D, 79 (2) DOI: 

2.  Nature blog on the WIMP data

3.  CMDS II paper

4.  Flyby anomalies and dark matter post


Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla

to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.

What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:

2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:

3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:

How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though!

Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very simpl…

Unschooling Math Jams: Squaring Numbers in their own Base

Some of the most fun I have working on math with seven year-old No. 1 is discovering new things about math myself.  Last week, we discovered that square of any number in its own base is 100!  Pretty cool!  As usual we figured it out by talking rather than by writing things down, and as usual it was sheer happenstance that we figured it out at all.  Here’s how it went.

I've really been looking forward to working through multiplication ala binary numbers with seven year-old No. 1.  She kind of beat me to the punch though: in the last few weeks she's been learning her multiplication tables in base 10 on her own.  This became apparent when five year-old No. 2 decided he wanted to do some 'schoolwork' a few days back.

"I can sing that song... about the letters? all by myself now!"  2 meant the alphabet song.  His attitude towards academics is the ultimate in not retaining unnecessary facts, not even the name of the song :)

After 2 had worked his way through the so…