Skip to main content

Lorentz Contraction, Accidental Degeneracy, and Coherent States

This is just a quick note since once again I have midterms.  I found what may be my favorite issue of the American Journal of Physics ever!  Here are short summaries of the three awesome articles from the July 1965 issue.

Lorentz Contractions
I've been doing a lot of reading on time dilation and Lorentz contractions lately.  Penrose[1], Terrell, and Boas all wrote articles in the later '50s/early '60s about the fact that a sphere moving at relativistic speeds won't look contracted.  It's outline will still be that of a sphere.  In 1965, Scott and Viner[2] followed up on this work with an article that provided, (to my thinking), a far easier way of visualizing what's going on than the other three.  They showed what a piece of graph paper and a set of boxes would look like when observed moving near the speed of light.  For an open access version of the math behind the article see this excellent web page on Terrell rotations[3].  The short version of the story runs something like this.  Because the box is moving at near the speed of light to the right, it can get out of the way of light coming from its back left corner.  So, in addition to the front of the box, a stationary observer will also see the left side of the box in what appears to be a rotation.  The edges of the box that are perpendicular to the direction of the boxes motion will appear to curve.  These curves can be mathematically described by hyperbolas which works out kind of nice since Minkowski space, (four dimensional spacetime), is an example of a hyperbolic geometry.

Accidental Degeneracies
A few months ago I wrote about an article written by Fock[4] where he had pointed out that what appeared to be accidental degeneracies in the energy levels of the hydrogen atom weren't accidental at all.  They merely revealed that the potential of the hydrogen atom behaved like a four dimensional potential that had been projected into a three dimensional space.

Shibuya and Wulfman[5] point out that Keplarian orbits have an accidental degeneracy, but lie in a two dimensional plane, so that the projected potential can be modeled in three dimensions and therefore visualized.  They provide photographs of a few examples.  Since the article was written before the advent of all the nice 3D plotting packages we have now, it appears they actually built solid models of the spherical potential, (see below picture 2).

Coherent States
Finally, the article that got me to look in this issue of the journal in the first place:  Carruthers and Nieto[6] wrote a very nice article illustrating the derivation and use of coherent states.  If you've been trying to work though Merzbacher like I have and would like a different perspective on coherent states, then this is the article for you.  The authors first posit a reason for deriving coherent states at all, as a tool for demonstrating the correspondence principal for harmonic oscillators.  They then show why you can't do this with number states: the expectation value of the oscillator amplitude is always zero.  Finally they proceed to show how coherent states can give an expectation value for both the amplitude and the phase of a harmonic oscillator.

Next, they show why coherent states are called coherent, (they are wave packets that don't spread out).  It is also demonstrated that while the coherent states aren't orthogonal, they are complete.

In closing, they do a very nice derivation of how coherent states can be used to solve the forced harmonic oscillator problem.

Now, I'm off to study angular momentum and coherent states for the midterm this afternoon!

1.  Penrose on Lorentz contracted spheres
Penrose R. (1959). The apparent shape of a relativistically moving sphere, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 55 (01) 137. DOI:

2.  Scott and Viner on Lorentz contactions
Scott G.D. (1965). The Geometrical Appearance of Large Objects Moving at Relativistic Speeds, American Journal of Physics, 33 (7) 534. DOI:

3.  Open access web page on Terrell rotations

4.  Fock's four dimensional potential

5.  On the three dimensional projection of rotational degeneracies
Shibuya T.I. (1965). The Kepler Problem in Two-Dimensional Momentum Space, American Journal of Physics, 33 (7) 570. DOI:

6.  All about coherent states
Carruthers P. (1965). Coherent States and the Forced Quantum Oscillator, American Journal of Physics, 33 (7) 537. DOI:

7.  Boas on Lorentz contracted spheres
Boas M.L. (1961). Apparent Shape of Large Objects at Relativistic Speeds, American Journal of Physics, 29 (5) 283. DOI:

8.  Terrell on Lorentz contracted spheres

Picture of the Day

From 3/18/13


Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla

to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.

What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:

2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:

3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:

How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though!

Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very simpl…

Unschooling Math Jams: Squaring Numbers in their own Base

Some of the most fun I have working on math with seven year-old No. 1 is discovering new things about math myself.  Last week, we discovered that square of any number in its own base is 100!  Pretty cool!  As usual we figured it out by talking rather than by writing things down, and as usual it was sheer happenstance that we figured it out at all.  Here’s how it went.

I've really been looking forward to working through multiplication ala binary numbers with seven year-old No. 1.  She kind of beat me to the punch though: in the last few weeks she's been learning her multiplication tables in base 10 on her own.  This became apparent when five year-old No. 2 decided he wanted to do some 'schoolwork' a few days back.

"I can sing that song... about the letters? all by myself now!"  2 meant the alphabet song.  His attitude towards academics is the ultimate in not retaining unnecessary facts, not even the name of the song :)

After 2 had worked his way through the so…