Skip to main content

Tesla, Meteors and Maps

I started out to write about parabolic coordinates and the chain rule this morning, but this was too much fun to resist. As I'm sure you've all seen over the last few days, a meteor came down over Russia last week.  Apparently the conspiracy theories have already started to crop up[1].  This got me thinking about the last Russian meteor with conspiracy theories, the Tunguska meteor strike[2].

The Tunguska Conspiracy
The story goes like this.  Tesla had realized that he was going to have to tear down Wardenclyffe, his ambitious project on Long Island to broadcast power to the world for free (picture 1).

He had time to make one last demonstration using the apparatus that the world would notice.  He told Admiral Byrd at a cocktail party, "When you get to the North Pole, look for my calling card."  Admiral Byrd saw nothing, and the whole event faded into obscurity, sort of.  Decades later, in the 1970's Russia finally released information on the Tunguska meteor strike, an event that literally knocked down miles of forest in Siberia.  The Tesla conspiracy buffs all cheered claiming that this was in fact Tesla's message to Admiral Byrd. He'd meant to fire his power antenna at Wardenclyffe and hit the North Pole.  He'd mis-aimed.  He hit Tunguska instead!

This always seemed easy enough to disprove.  Just stretch a string across a globe from Long Island through the North Pole and see if you wind up in Tunguska.  This morning inspired by the new meteor strike, I finally tried the experiment.  Here are the results (picture 2).

As you can see, a line from Wardenclyffe to Tunguska completely misses the North Pole.

Tesla Conspiracy with Time Travel
So, Tunguska didn't work out, but what about the location of the new meteor strike, Chelyabinsk, Russia?  What if Tesla's energy beam had also opened a time warp and wound up coming out in 2013?  A line drawn form Chelyabinsk to Wardenclyffe is shown below (picture 3).

We get yet another clean miss with respect to the north pole, both the geographic and the magnetic north poles.

The next map shows the paths where the 'energy beam' would have hit had it been aimed through either of the north poles (picture 4).

Awwwww, Man!!!
So, having dispelled the Tesla vs. Tunguska and invented and then dispelled the Tesla vs. Chelyabinsk conspiracy theory, there I only had one last thing I wanted to check.  If you drew a line from Chelyabinsk over the north pole, where would it land?  The first interesting thing that came up was that the line goes right between the magnetic and geographic north poles as it heads for the opposite hemisphere (picture 5).

Now, all that's left is to follow the line on down to the surely innocuous location on the other side of the earth.  But..... and I'm really sorry, (sort of)...  here's where it lands (picture 6)

That's right, it comes down roughly 70 miles to the west of Area 51.  Go figure.




Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla

to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.

What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:

2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:

3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:

How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

Lost Phone

We were incredibly lucky to have both been in university settings when our kids were born.  When No. 1 arrived, we were both still grad students.  Not long after No. 2 arrived, (about 10 days to be exact), mom-person defended her dissertation and gained the appellation prependage Dr. 

While there are lots of perks attendant to grad school, not the least of them phenomenal health insurance, that’s not the one that’s come to mind for me just now.  The one I’m most grateful for at the moment with respect to our kids was the opportunities for sheer independence.  Most days, we’d meet for lunch on the quad of whatever university we were hanging out at at the time, (physics research requires a bit of travel), to eat lunch.  During those lunches, the kids could crawl, toddle, or jog off into the distance.  There were no roads, and therefore no cars.  And, I realize now with a certain wistful bliss I had no knowledge of at the time, there were also very few people at hand that new what a baby…

Lab Book 2014_07_10 More NaI Characterization

Summary: Much more plunking around with the NaI detector and sources today.  A Pb shield was built to eliminate cosmic ray muons as well as potassium 40 radiation from the concreted building.  The spectra are much cleaner, but still don't have the count rates or distinctive peaks that are expected.
New to the experiment?  Scroll to the bottom to see background and get caught up.
Lab Book Threshold for the QVT is currently set at -1.49 volts.  Remember to divide this by 100 to get the actual threshold voltage. A new spectrum recording the lines of all three sources, Cs 137, Co 60, and Sr 90, was started at approximately 10:55. Took data for about an hour.
Started the Cs 137 only spectrum at about 11:55 AM

Here’s the no-source background from yesterday
In comparison, here’s the 3 source spectrum from this morning.

The three source spectrum shows peak structure not exhibited by the background alone. I forgot to take scope pictures of the Cs137 run. I do however, have the printout, and…