Skip to main content

Nuclear Spin and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

The Podkletnov apparatus we're reconstructing in the New Mexico State University Superconductoro Gravity experiment places a superconducting disc in two orthogonal oscillating magnetic fields. Early nuclear magnetic resonance experiments by Bloch and Purcell's groups used a constant magnetic field in combination with an orthogonally oriented RF coil that was driven around 29 MHz, (a frequency in the same range as that used by Podkletnov for the rotation coils). Li and Torr, two of the early researchers of the Podkletnov effect hypothesized that gravitomagnetic fields might be observed as the result of aligned nuclear spins in superconductors.

Figures from Bloch, et. el. NMR setup:
From Rigden, Reviews of Modern Physics, 58, (1986), 433

Rigden, Reviews of Modern Physics, 58, (1986), 433

Figure of orthogonal field coils in Podkletnov apparatus:
From From EE Podkletnov, arxiv, (1997), http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/9701074

I did a little research on nuclear magnetic resonance today and came across a number of good articles on its early development. The first article was a nice review of the development of nuclear magnetic resonance in Reviews of Modern Physics by Rigden. Rigden pointed two articles that detail some of the initial work of Rabi, et. al. to measure nuclear spin. If you've covered the Stern-Gerlach experiment and the different quantum numbers, these are easy to read explanations of the work as it developed.

References:
Li, Torr, Gravitational effects on the magnetic attenuation of superconductors, 46, (1992), 5489
Rigden, Reviews of Modern Physics, 58, (1986), 433
Breit, Rabi, Physical Review, 38, (1931), 2082
Rabi, Physical Review, 49, (1936), 324
Purcell, Pound, Bloembergen, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Absorption in Hydrogen Gas, Physical Review, 70, (1946), 986
Purcell, Torrey, Pound, Resonance Absorption by Nuclear Magnetic Moments in a Solid, Physical Review, 69, (1946), 37
Bloch, Nuclear Induction, Physical Review, 70, (1946), 460
Bloch, Hansen, Packard, The Nuclear Induction Experiment, Physical Review, 70, (1946), 474
Lindley, NMR–Grandmother of MRI, http://physics.aps.org/story/v18/st18
Pound, From radar to nuclear magnetic resonance, Reviews of Modern Physics, 71, (1999), S54

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla



to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.



What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:



2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:



3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:



How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though!

Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very simpl…

Unschooling Math Jams: Squaring Numbers in their own Base

Some of the most fun I have working on math with seven year-old No. 1 is discovering new things about math myself.  Last week, we discovered that square of any number in its own base is 100!  Pretty cool!  As usual we figured it out by talking rather than by writing things down, and as usual it was sheer happenstance that we figured it out at all.  Here’s how it went.

I've really been looking forward to working through multiplication ala binary numbers with seven year-old No. 1.  She kind of beat me to the punch though: in the last few weeks she's been learning her multiplication tables in base 10 on her own.  This became apparent when five year-old No. 2 decided he wanted to do some 'schoolwork' a few days back.

"I can sing that song... about the letters? all by myself now!"  2 meant the alphabet song.  His attitude towards academics is the ultimate in not retaining unnecessary facts, not even the name of the song :)

After 2 had worked his way through the so…