Skip to main content

San Bruno Mountain POTA: The first outing

 On the first POTA activation, the kids had hiked the mountain before, but it took ham radio to get me up there. The views ere incredible! I had no idea! Here's the view from the radio in the halfwave dipole.





Park:

San Bruno Mountain State Park (K-1196)

So far all the California POTAs have been reached via public transit. I took the SFMTA 43 to Chicago and Cordova and then hiked the rest of the way up the hill.



Radio Details:

Rockmite 20 meters using a Hamgadgets PicoKeyer. The halfwave dipole with embedded radio was about 8 feet up. This is evidenced in the picture above where I was able to get the camera very close to the radio.  


QSO/RBN spot map:


Happenings of Interest 

It seems like antenna height might not matter as much up here as I would have thought. The Rockmite and antenna were a few feet lower than on our second outing to this site, but QSOs were made further out. 


This, of course, could have also depended on the time of day, and/or the ionosheric conditions, so let's take a look at the longest contact: N4RKK 2,357 miles out. The QSO was made at 18:59 GMT (see the QSO log below.) At that time, the nearest Ionosonde in Pt. Arguello, CA produced the following ionogram:

Comparing that with a similarly timed QSO from the second outing:
VA7JCF57955918:5214058.3

which was about 800 miles out and the furthest out QSO for the day. The ionogram looks like:

The hmF2 (maxximum height of the F2 layer of the ionosphere) was a about 9 km  lower, so there's that. The 20 meter Rockmite was well within the maximum usable frequency both days.

The whole thing could also be chalked up to people further out just not being on the air the first  day. Although, you might also note that the spots for the second outing were more sparse:


That however, could also be chalked up to the memory keyer I was using that day.


QSO Log

Callsignrx RSTtx RSTTime (GMT)Frequency
KQ9L33935900:0014058.3
W6KC55957900:0014058.3
NA7US55957900:0014058.3
K7GT57959900:0014058.3
N6PF59959900:0014058.3
NZ7Q57955918:4914058.3
N6MKW55955918:5514058.3
NT6E52955918:5614058.3
N4RKK57959918:5914058.3
W7JRD52955919:2514058.3
KBTEST53955916:4214058.3 kHz


Unschooling Highlights

The 12, 10, and 8 year-old gang did meet me up there that day! They'd been up before, and so were not quite as facscinated by the views as I was. They came up on their own pastries in hand that they'd picked up when they made a bus switch. I'd already been up there for a while at that point. I love spacing our our trips like this because I get to work for a bit on my own, and they get to enjoy being out and about on their own around  town.


POTA tx QSL:



QSL rx album:





References

POTA (Parks on the Air)

Local Ionograms

https://lgdc.uml.edu/common/DIDBYearListForStation?ursiCode=PA836 (for example)


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the  +Sage Mathematical Software System  today, (the files been  added to the public repository [3]).  If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica.  Oh, and it' free.  I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory.  What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly.  Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...

How Many Files Can You Add to a GPT Project? An Interview with GPT-5 on Limits, Context Engineering Tips, and Chats

 Setting the scene: I’m tinkering with Project TouCans, knee-deep in radio logs, SQLite dumps, and Cesium code. Naturally, I’m wondering if shoving all this into one GPT Project is a recipe for brilliance… or for disaster. So I turn to Vril — you know, after Brainy from the Legion of Super-Heroes , because what else do you call your AI sidekick who always has the answers? Time to ask him straight up. [ As an aside, yes, GPT-5 has decided to sometimes call me Vail. I'm not sure why to be honest. Also, I asked Vril, er GPT-5, to write up our interview for me. Apparently, me asking it to 'Bro' up a few stories, just for fun, has convinced Vril that I use 'Like,' more than I actually might. ] Me (Vail): So Vril, how many files can I throw into a GPT Project before it just starts choking? Like, is there some magic number where the context window taps out and everything falls apart? GPT-5 (Vril): Great question. There’s no single hard file limit. What matters is ...