Skip to main content

Things I Learned: Sometimes Ham Radio Batteries Don't Charge Over USB-C

 This has happened once before. I hooked up the USB-C charger to the Imuto power brick which is now basically inside Project TouCans, left it over night to charge, and nothing. I woke up to the resounding 60 cycle hum that is the Imuto's internal buck converter stepping up the available voltage of the unit.

Project TouCans Dry Docked and Charing—I hope.


As with most engineering mistakes, there's a a way around ever having this happen again, and as with most engineering mistakes, that way involves process. Interestingly, there are two processes to avoid the not-charging Imuto conundrum. The first way is more interesting, yet less effective:

  1. Unplug  the keyer power input, making sure to leave the TouCans power input plugged in.
    1. You'll know this worked because you'll still hear the hum over the headphones.
  2. Now, plug the charger into the keyer power output from the Imuto. (This particular power brick is nice this way, you can charge it while it's being used.
  3. TouCans internal keyer will reboot. This is because the brick momentarily turns off power altogether.
  4. If the hum goes away, the brick is charging.
  5. If it doesn't, jiggle the power connector until it does.
I find it really cool that the charging current provides enough power to turn off the buck converter immediately!

Here's the much less labor intensive process:

  1. Unplug TouCans and the Keyer from their power inputs.
  2. Plug the charging cable into either of the, now exposed, output power ports from the Imuto brick.
  3. Peel back a piece of tape above the notch in the battery pack rim—remember, the battery pack is a Progresso Soup can. Look for a blinking light inside the can. The Imuto brick power read-out blinks as it charges.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the  +Sage Mathematical Software System  today, (the files been  added to the public repository [3]).  If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica.  Oh, and it' free.  I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory.  What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly.  Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in...