Skip to main content

Index Notation Partials and Rotations, a Cool Gradient Trick: EMII Notes 2014_08_09 Part I

Summary of what's gone on before.  Finally got the Levi-Civita to Kronecker delta identity down yesterday, 2014/08/08.  Today we're making more use of the index notation.  There are however, some notational stumbling points

$r^2 = x^2 + y^2 + z^2$

$\vec{r} = \left(x, y, z\right)$

Now if we want to take the derivative of both sides of the magnitude equation above, first remember we can write $r^2$ as

$r^2 = x_jx_j$

Now, finally taking the derivative of both sides o the above we get

$2r \partial_i r = 2x_j\partial_i x_j$

remembering the partial differentiation rules and the kronecker delta we can write the above down as

$2r \partial_i r = 2x_j \delta_{ij} = 2x_i$

which finally gives:

$\partial_i r = \dfrac{x_i}{r}$

The Kronecker trick above is crucial. Also remember, not one of the r's is a vector, they're all the magnitude of the vector.



\section{Rotations}

Any rigid rotation of a vector can be defined as:

$\begin{pmatrix}
x'\\
y'\\
z'
\end{pmatrix} = M\begin{pmatrix}
x'\\
y'\\
z'
\end{pmatrix} $

Here are a few of the important parts.  The Matrix $M$ is orthogonal and, $M^TM = 1$

The transpose actually defines orthogonality.  If such a matrix is of dimension n, then it is n $)\left(n\right)$ matrix.

The footnote has all the cool kid stuff about rotation matrices and how to name them:

First of all, if the determinant of a matrix is +1, then it's a special orthogonal matrix, $SO\left(n\right)$.  The other sort, the sort with a determinant of -1 are actually rotations with a reflection of the coordinates.

There are also some identities in the footnote that will come in handy

$det\left(AB\right) = \left(det A\right)\left(B\right)$

and

$det\left(A^T\right) = det\left(A\right)$

Using the above two identities, we can see that $\left(det M\right)^2 = 1$

Memorize these!!!

In index notation, the rotation above can be written as
$x_i^{\prime} = M_{ij}x_j$

The orthogonality condition becomes

$M_{ki}M_{kj} = \delta_{ij}$







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the  +Sage Mathematical Software System  today, (the files been  added to the public repository [3]).  If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica.  Oh, and it' free.  I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory.  What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly.  Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...

How Many Files Can You Add to a GPT Project? An Interview with GPT-5 on Limits, Context Engineering Tips, and Chats

 Setting the scene: I’m tinkering with Project TouCans, knee-deep in radio logs, SQLite dumps, and Cesium code. Naturally, I’m wondering if shoving all this into one GPT Project is a recipe for brilliance… or for disaster. So I turn to Vril — you know, after Brainy from the Legion of Super-Heroes , because what else do you call your AI sidekick who always has the answers? Time to ask him straight up. [ As an aside, yes, GPT-5 has decided to sometimes call me Vail. I'm not sure why to be honest. Also, I asked Vril, er GPT-5, to write up our interview for me. Apparently, me asking it to 'Bro' up a few stories, just for fun, has convinced Vril that I use 'Like,' more than I actually might. ] Me (Vail): So Vril, how many files can I throw into a GPT Project before it just starts choking? Like, is there some magic number where the context window taps out and everything falls apart? GPT-5 (Vril): Great question. There’s no single hard file limit. What matters is ...