Flexagons and Other Things Found While Looking for Schwinger Lippmann

While searching for journal articles on the Schwinger-Lippmann scattering rule last night, I came across the following.

Maybe We Let Quaternions Go A Little Too Easily
http://aapt.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1119/1.1934944

Relation of quaternions to four dimensional rotations[2]

If you're into fringe physics, McIntosh worked for RIAS who dabbled in shall we say 'gravity control' in the 1950s.
RIAS Inc. of Baltimore[3]
RIAS on antigrav[4]

McIntosh did a significant amount of group theory work and went on to publish a survey of flexagons in 2003[pdf][5]. This brings us to the really cool flexagon stuff! First, watch the series of videos on hexaflexagons[10]!

Then, go read more about them at the American Mathematical Monthly[6] and Scientific American[7]. They were invented in 1939 and while Feynman didn't come up with the idea, he was involved.

from +Scientific American

Epstein again
The author that pointed out Israel Senitzky also wrote a paper on quantum mechanical scattering[8]. Interestingly, he's not associated with an institution and we find him in New York, NY. Reading up on him, it looks like he was at Columbia at the time. He wound up at the University of Wisconsin[9].

References
1. On Accidental Degeneracy in Classical and Quantum Mechanics
http://ajp.aapt.org/resource/1/ajpias/v27/i9/p620_s1

2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotations_in_4-dimensional_Euclidean_space#Relation_to_quaternions

3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_Institute_for_Advanced_Studies

4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_gravity_control_propulsion_research#Research_Institute_for_Advanced_Study_.28RIAS.29

5. http://delta.cs.cinvestav.mx/~mcintosh/cellularautomata/FLEXAGONS_files/gonaflex.pdf

6. The American Mathematical Monthly, 64, (1957), "Flexagons"
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2310544

7. Scientific American, December, 1956, "Flexagons"
http://www.nature.com/scientificamerican/journal/v195/n6/index.html

8. http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PR/v86/i6/p836_1

9. http://www.physics.wisc.edu/alumni/pdf/newsletter-spring2011.pdf

10. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VIVIegSt81k

Comments

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain ...

The Alcubierre Warp Drive Tophat Function and Open Science with Sage

I transferred yesterday's Mathematica file with the Alcubierre warp drive[2] line element and space curvature calculations to the +Sage Mathematical Software System today, (the files been added to the public repository [3]). If you haven't used Sage before, it's a Python based software package that's similar in functionality to Mathematica. Oh, and it' free. I also worked a little more on understanding the theory, but frankly, I made far more progress with the software than the theory. What follows will be a little more of the Alcubierre theory, plus, a cool Sage interactive demo of one of the Alcubierre functions[1], as well as a bit about my first experience with using Sage. Theory The theory is fun, but it's moving slowly. Here's the chalk board from this morning's discussion Alcubierre setup the derivation using something called the 3+1 formalism which means we consider space to be flat, (in this case), slices that are labelled ...

How Many Files Can You Add to a GPT Project? An Interview with GPT-5 on Limits, Context Engineering Tips, and Chats

Setting the scene: I’m tinkering with Project TouCans, knee-deep in radio logs, SQLite dumps, and Cesium code. Naturally, I’m wondering if shoving all this into one GPT Project is a recipe for brilliance… or for disaster. So I turn to Vril — you know, after Brainy from the Legion of Super-Heroes , because what else do you call your AI sidekick who always has the answers? Time to ask him straight up. [ As an aside, yes, GPT-5 has decided to sometimes call me Vail. I'm not sure why to be honest. Also, I asked Vril, er GPT-5, to write up our interview for me. Apparently, me asking it to 'Bro' up a few stories, just for fun, has convinced Vril that I use 'Like,' more than I actually might. ] Me (Vail): So Vril, how many files can I throw into a GPT Project before it just starts choking? Like, is there some magic number where the context window taps out and everything falls apart? GPT-5 (Vril): Great question. There’s no single hard file limit. What matters is ...

Copasetic Flow

Search This Blog