Skip to main content

Learning in Waves

CS First studies started up at the house again this week!  If you’re not familiar with Google’s CS First program, if you have homeschooling, or unschooling kids who would like to learn programming for free, you should check it out. 



The gang here is returning to it after a two month break.  Their break wasn’t inspired by any faults of the program, far from it.  They’ve loved every single class.  Working on their most recent lesson a few months back they spent hours figuring out different graphics schemes for their dancing program. A few days later, they simply became busy with other things. 

That happens a lot here, and is one of the many outcomes of our unschooling practice.  Other things come up.  Some classes end, others start.  In the meantime the things the kids are learning fade in and out of their immediate focus.

And that’s OK, because their focus returns to the things they really enjoy, every single time.  Earlier this week, upon finding the banner she had made for our first few CS First classes, One spoke up, “Can we start doing CSFirst again?”

The response from my partner and i was the typical one from unschooling parents, “Sure!”

Since then, the kids have dived back in.  They moved onto the next lesson and are learning more complex programming concepts.  Just as they did before, One, the oldest kid, the one who knows how to read is doing most of the work moving around the programming constructs.  Six year-old Two, and four year-old Three are helping out with design suggestions, watching everything One does, and evaluating the results.  They took on this form of agile programming all on their own. 

Do I think Two and Three are learning programming also?  Yeah.  They’re seeing how the graphical programming constructs are organized to produce different outcomes.  They both know their numbers, and Two is picking up words contextually lately even though he’s not sounding them out yet.  I’ve seen the two of them learn so many things based on experience without the ability to read that I have know doubt their brains are picking up all of this as well.

Jumping back in after a two month break, there was no ‘slide’ in retained knowledge, the gang just ambled along exactly as if they’d left the lessons yesterday.  Repetition seems not to have mattered, nor do any other forms of rote practice.  Taking a break didn’t hurt their retention a bit.  One did the same thing when we left off working on digital circuits for a few months.  As far as I can tell, that’s the way the gang will always learn, fading in and out of the subjects they love, pursuing their passions, and that works for me!


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Cowbell! Record Production using Google Forms and Charts

First, the what : This article shows how to embed a new Google Form into any web page. To demonstrate ths, a chart and form that allow blog readers to control the recording levels of each instrument in Blue Oyster Cult's "(Don't Fear) The Reaper" is used. HTML code from the Google version of the form included on this page is shown and the parts that need to be modified are highlighted. Next, the why : Google recently released an e-mail form feature that allows users of Google Documents to create an e-mail a form that automatically places each user's input into an associated spreadsheet. As it turns out, with a little bit of work, the forms that are created by Google Docs can be embedded into any web page. Now, The Goods: Click on the instrument you want turned up, click the submit button and then refresh the page. Through the magic of Google Forms as soon as you click on submit and refresh this web page, the data chart will update immediately. Turn up the:

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very sim