Skip to main content

Mapping the NaI Detector's Energy Response: Lab Book 2014_08_19


Summary:  The bias on the PMT was turned to its maximum safe value of 1500 V for maximum gain.  There is a bit of a voltage drop in the PMT base between supply voltage and the anode voltage, so at 1500 V supply voltage, we’re still not running at the maximum rated cathode to anode voltage of 1500 V.  Using peaks from several sources, a channel vs. energy graph was constructed.  Although some of the peaks have small counts and need to be measured more accurately, the linearity looks good with a resolution of about 188 V per channel and a maximum detectable energy of about 203 keV.

If you're new to the experiment, scroll to the bottom for background information.

Data and Channel vs. Energy Mapping

Bias
1500 V
Gate Window
0.5 uS
Threshold
1.5mV
Attenuation
0 dB
Data set
HBC_00011
Source
Am 241 Taped to window
Start Time
~ 11:17 AM
Stop Time
~~ 1:30 PM
Date
2014_08_19
x-y scope V/div
1, 0.5
Shielded?
Yes
Tube
Harshaw B-

Spectrum Data





Bias
1500 V
Gate Window
0.5 uS
Threshold
1.5mV
Attenuation
0 dB
Data set
HBC_00012
Source
Cd 109 Taped to window
Start Time
2:18 PM
Stop Time
2:50 PM
Date
2014_08_19
x-y scope V/div
1, 0.5
Shielded?
Yes
Tube
Harshaw B-



Bias
1500 V
Gate Window
0.5 uS
Threshold
1.5mV
Attenuation
0 dB
Data set
HBC_00013
Source
Background
Start Time
2:56 PM
Stop Time
3:37 PM
Date
2014_08_19
x-y scope V/div
1, 0.5
Shielded?
Yes
Tube
Harshaw B-








Bias
1500 V
Gate Window
0.5 uS
Threshold
1.5mV
Attenuation
0 dB
Data set
HBC_00014
Source
Cs 137 Taped to window
Start Time
3:35 PM
Stop Time
3:59 PM
Date
2014_08_19
x-y scope V/div
1, 0.5
Shielded?
Yes
Tube
Harshaw B-

This run needs to be much longer to get more reliable statistics.  The run today was a short one to get a ballpark picture of the detector’s channel vs. energy behavior





Channel Mapping
Using the peaks location from the three sources listed above, Am 241, Cd 109, and Cs 137, the response of the detector with respect to energy was mapped out.
The data for the peak locations is shown in the table below
Source
Peak Channel
Energy eV
Cd109
55
22100
am241
86
26344
Cs 127
104
32000
Am241
262
59541
Cd109
406
88000

1023
203390.39

The last row is a calculation using the least squares regression fit parameters to determine the maximum energy that can be detected.
The peak energies vs. channel are shown in the following graph.


Background
Hirsch's theory of hole superconductivity proposes a new BCS-compatible model of Cooper pair formation when superconducting materials phase transition from their normal to their superconducting state[1].  One of the experimentally verifiable predictions of his theory is that when a superconductor rapidly transitions, (quenches), back to its normal state, it will emit x-rays, (colloquially referred to here as H-rays because it's Hirsch's theory).

A superconductor can be rapidly transitioned back to its normal state by placing it in a strong magnetic field.  My experiment will look for H-rays emitted by both a Pb and a YBCO superconductor when it is quenched by a strong magnetic field.
This series of articles chronicles both the experimental lab work and the theory work that’s going into completing the experiment.

The lab book entries in this series detail the preparation and execution of this experiment… mostly.  I also have a few theory projects involving special relativity and quantum field theory.  Occasionally, they appear in these pages.

Call for Input
If you have any ideas, questions, or comments, they're very welcome!

References
1.  Hirsch, J. E., “Pair production and ionizing radiation from superconductors”, http://arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0508529

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More Cowbell! Record Production using Google Forms and Charts

First, the what : This article shows how to embed a new Google Form into any web page. To demonstrate ths, a chart and form that allow blog readers to control the recording levels of each instrument in Blue Oyster Cult's "(Don't Fear) The Reaper" is used. HTML code from the Google version of the form included on this page is shown and the parts that need to be modified are highlighted. Next, the why : Google recently released an e-mail form feature that allows users of Google Documents to create an e-mail a form that automatically places each user's input into an associated spreadsheet. As it turns out, with a little bit of work, the forms that are created by Google Docs can be embedded into any web page. Now, The Goods: Click on the instrument you want turned up, click the submit button and then refresh the page. Through the magic of Google Forms as soon as you click on submit and refresh this web page, the data chart will update immediately. Turn up the:

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

Now available as a Kindle ebook for 99 cents ! Get a spiffy ebook, and fund more physics The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems , there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes! What do we actually want? To convert the Cartesian nabla to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates. What we’ll need: 1. The Cartesian Nabla: 2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates: 3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system: How to do it: Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables. The chain

The Valentine's Day Magnetic Monopole

There's an assymetry to the form of the two Maxwell's equations shown in picture 1.  While the divergence of the electric field is proportional to the electric charge density at a given point, the divergence of the magnetic field is equal to zero.  This is typically explained in the following way.  While we know that electrons, the fundamental electric charge carriers exist, evidence seems to indicate that magnetic monopoles, the particles that would carry magnetic 'charge', either don't exist, or, the energies required to create them are so high that they are exceedingly rare.  That doesn't stop us from looking for them though! Keeping with the theme of Fairbank[1] and his academic progeny over the semester break, today's post is about the discovery of a magnetic monopole candidate event by one of the Fairbank's graduate students, Blas Cabrera[2].  Cabrera was utilizing a loop type of magnetic monopole detector.  Its operation is in concept very sim