Skip to main content

Peer Reviewed Political Reporting

This is strange.  +Lamar Smith has received a lot of free press in the last few weeks for his treatment of the NSF grant process and some NSF funded projects.  The latest round of tirades against Smith, appears to be based on, well, nothing.  Nathaniel Downs at addictinginfo.org[1] claims of Smith's latest draft bill:
The bill says that any research done using federal funds (which is the majority of research done in the United States) must have its results and finding approved by the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives. If the findings are not agreed to, the research is taken from the researchers and disposed of by Congress as it sees fit.
Which would be just awful, if the bill actually said anything remotely like that, which it doesn't.  The bill text can be found at a Huffington Post link[2].  I haven't been able to find a link to it at Thomas.gov yet.  I suspect that's because the bill is still in its draft form and hasn't been introduced to Congress yet.  Here's the copy of the bill referred to above so you can read it yourself.



I'll give you the bill is a bit baffling as it calls for things that are basically already done.  It calls for the NSF to publicly announce several aspects of any project that they are considering funding.  The announcement does have to contain text that states how the project is beneficial to the American people, the defense of the nation and so on.  That's it though, they just have to make an announcement.  If they fail to make the announcement, or aren't original enough to define how the research provides a benefit, (virtually all research provides some benefit),  then the funds for the project are not to be awarded and are to be given to other projects.  The funds for projects that aren't awarded are already given to other projects under the current process.  In fact, that's almost the definition of the grant funding process.  Some lose, Others win.  The winners take the money.  The real question to me is what Smith thinks this bill actually accomplishes.  The NSF also already requires grant proposals to contain a section stating the research's impact on society at large.

There's also been a bit of a fuss in the media that the bill calls for the NSF to rather promptly state how they will implement the bill.  The implementation section is a common feature of just about every bill.  Passing a law without a way to measure how it has been implemented or for that matter undertaking any project with a way to measure its implementation is rather ineffective.

From what I hear, there are plenty of ways in which Smith is proposing questionable treatment of scientific funding.  Perhaps it would be better to focus on those.  I have heard from +Pamela Wang  that there's a more recent version of the bill available and hope to hear more about it soon.


References:
1.  addictinginfo article
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2013/05/02/republican-congressman-introduces-bill-to-require-political-approval-of-scientific-papers/

2.  Bill text
http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/HQRA.pdf

3.  Smith's letter to the NSF director inquiring about five specific funded projects
http://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/4%2025%2013%20NSF%20re%20grant%20.pdf

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla



to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.



What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:



2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:



3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:



How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

Lost Phone

We were incredibly lucky to have both been in university settings when our kids were born.  When No. 1 arrived, we were both still grad students.  Not long after No. 2 arrived, (about 10 days to be exact), mom-person defended her dissertation and gained the appellation prependage Dr. 

While there are lots of perks attendant to grad school, not the least of them phenomenal health insurance, that’s not the one that’s come to mind for me just now.  The one I’m most grateful for at the moment with respect to our kids was the opportunities for sheer independence.  Most days, we’d meet for lunch on the quad of whatever university we were hanging out at at the time, (physics research requires a bit of travel), to eat lunch.  During those lunches, the kids could crawl, toddle, or jog off into the distance.  There were no roads, and therefore no cars.  And, I realize now with a certain wistful bliss I had no knowledge of at the time, there were also very few people at hand that new what a baby…

Lab Book 2014_07_10 More NaI Characterization

Summary: Much more plunking around with the NaI detector and sources today.  A Pb shield was built to eliminate cosmic ray muons as well as potassium 40 radiation from the concreted building.  The spectra are much cleaner, but still don't have the count rates or distinctive peaks that are expected.
New to the experiment?  Scroll to the bottom to see background and get caught up.
Lab Book Threshold for the QVT is currently set at -1.49 volts.  Remember to divide this by 100 to get the actual threshold voltage. A new spectrum recording the lines of all three sources, Cs 137, Co 60, and Sr 90, was started at approximately 10:55. Took data for about an hour.
Started the Cs 137 only spectrum at about 11:55 AM

Here’s the no-source background from yesterday
In comparison, here’s the 3 source spectrum from this morning.

The three source spectrum shows peak structure not exhibited by the background alone. I forgot to take scope pictures of the Cs137 run. I do however, have the printout, and…