Skip to main content

The Candidates on Space: Election '08


Popular Mechanics ran an interesting feature. They presented each of the candidates views on a number of issues that are of interest to their readers.

Among the issues was space exploration. According to Popular Mechanics only two of the candidates have any view at all. Both of those are Democrats, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama. According to PM, none of the Republican candidates weighed in on this issue!

I did a little hunting around and found that most of the candidates have reported views on space exploration. Links to the views of the rest of the candidates follow.

Ron Paul: This is a link to Ron Paul's stance on privatizing space from 1988. There doesn't seem to be anything available after that.

John Edwards: The following link describes what Kerry and Edwards thought about space in the 2004 election. They didn't come out with their views until days before the election last time, maybe Edwards is waiting again this time.

Rudy Giuliani: Giuliani spoke on the future of the space administration on January 18th.

Mike Huckabee: CNN had a few words on Huckabee's response to a debate question regarding the space program.

John McCain: McCain's views are summarized here with an attribution to his campaign site.

Mitt Romney: A few notes from a Fox News blogger on Romney's NASA views.

If I've left out your favorite candidate, please let me know in the comments below, and I'll fire off an update!

Comments

Jim Bowery said…
Ron Paul's 1988 policy is the only sane policy. His vitriolic comments have been proven tragically prescient over the intervening 2 decades.

Popular posts from this blog

Cool Math Tricks: Deriving the Divergence, (Del or Nabla) into New (Cylindrical) Coordinate Systems

The following is a pretty lengthy procedure, but converting the divergence, (nabla, del) operator between coordinate systems comes up pretty often. While there are tables for converting between common coordinate systems, there seem to be fewer explanations of the procedure for deriving the conversion, so here goes!

What do we actually want?

To convert the Cartesian nabla



to the nabla for another coordinate system, say… cylindrical coordinates.



What we’ll need:

1. The Cartesian Nabla:



2. A set of equations relating the Cartesian coordinates to cylindrical coordinates:



3. A set of equations relating the Cartesian basis vectors to the basis vectors of the new coordinate system:



How to do it:

Use the chain rule for differentiation to convert the derivatives with respect to the Cartesian variables to derivatives with respect to the cylindrical variables.

The chain rule can be used to convert a differential operator in terms of one variable into a series of differential operators in terms of othe…

Lab Book 2014_07_10 More NaI Characterization

Summary: Much more plunking around with the NaI detector and sources today.  A Pb shield was built to eliminate cosmic ray muons as well as potassium 40 radiation from the concreted building.  The spectra are much cleaner, but still don't have the count rates or distinctive peaks that are expected.
New to the experiment?  Scroll to the bottom to see background and get caught up.
Lab Book Threshold for the QVT is currently set at -1.49 volts.  Remember to divide this by 100 to get the actual threshold voltage. A new spectrum recording the lines of all three sources, Cs 137, Co 60, and Sr 90, was started at approximately 10:55. Took data for about an hour.
Started the Cs 137 only spectrum at about 11:55 AM

Here’s the no-source background from yesterday
In comparison, here’s the 3 source spectrum from this morning.

The three source spectrum shows peak structure not exhibited by the background alone. I forgot to take scope pictures of the Cs137 run. I do however, have the printout, and…

Unschooling Math Jams: Squaring Numbers in their own Base

Some of the most fun I have working on math with seven year-old No. 1 is discovering new things about math myself.  Last week, we discovered that square of any number in its own base is 100!  Pretty cool!  As usual we figured it out by talking rather than by writing things down, and as usual it was sheer happenstance that we figured it out at all.  Here’s how it went.

I've really been looking forward to working through multiplication ala binary numbers with seven year-old No. 1.  She kind of beat me to the punch though: in the last few weeks she's been learning her multiplication tables in base 10 on her own.  This became apparent when five year-old No. 2 decided he wanted to do some 'schoolwork' a few days back.

"I can sing that song... about the letters? all by myself now!"  2 meant the alphabet song.  His attitude towards academics is the ultimate in not retaining unnecessary facts, not even the name of the song :)

After 2 had worked his way through the so…